期刊文献+

体素内不相干运动联合扩散峰度成像模型对乳腺良恶性病灶的鉴别诊断价值 被引量:14

The value of IVIM-DKI model in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨体素内不相干运动(IVIM)技术联合扩散峰度成像(DKI)对乳腺良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值。方法:137例女性患者(共153个病灶)行双侧乳腺多b值DWI检查(b=0~2000s/mm2);分别使用IVIM、DKI模型获得病灶的真性扩散系数(D)、灌注相关扩散系数(D*)、灌注分数(f)以及平均扩散峰度系数(MK)、平均扩散系数(MD)和ADC值。分析这些参数在乳腺良恶性病变中的变化规律,采用受试者工作特性曲线(ROC)评估各参数的诊断效能。结果:良恶性病灶的D、f、MK、ADC和MD值的中位数差异有统计学意义(P值分别为0.000、0.020、0.000、0.000和0.000),良恶性病灶D*值的差异无统计学意义(P=0.480)。D值与和MK、ADC和MD值在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的可靠性相当,两两比较差异无统计学意义(P值均大于0.1)。当MK值及D、ADC和MD值的阈值分别取0.8073及0.9536×10-3、1.1436×10-3和1.5657×10-3 mm2/s时,鉴别良恶性病灶的敏感度和特异度依次分别为(95.7%,84.2%)及(95.7%,81.6%)、(96.5%,84.2%)和(93.9%,84.2%)。ROC曲线分析得出D值的诊断效能最大(AUC=0.91)。联合D值和MK值的AUC达0.92。结论:采用IVIM和DKI模型获得的相关参数有助于乳腺良恶性病灶的鉴别,以IVIM模型中的真性扩散系数的诊断敏感性和特异性较高,联合真性扩散系数和扩散峰度系数的诊断效能最高。 Objective:To study the diagnostic value of IVIM-DKI model MRI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. Methods: 137 female patients (153 lesions in total) underwent multi b value (b=0-2000s/mm^2) DWI scanning. Tissue diffusivity (D) ,pseudo-diffusivity (D*) ,perfusion fraction (f) and mean diffusion kurtosis (MK) ,mean diffusivity (MD) and ADC were calculated using IVIM and DKI model. The difference of these parameters in benign and malignant breast lesions was analyzed statistically. The diagnostic performance of these parameters was evaluated by ROC analysis. Results:There were statistically significant differences between malignant and benign lesions in the diffusion parameters of median D, f, MK, ADC and MD value (P= 0. 000,0. 020,0. 000,0. 000 and 0. 000 respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in D* value (P=0. 480). The reliability of D, MK, ADC and MD value for differential diagnosis of be- nign and malignant breast lesions was similar, there was no significant difference between any two of them (P~ 0. 05). When the optimal threshold of MK,D,ADC and MD value was 0. 8073,and 0. 9536)〈 10 a, 1. 1436 X 10 a and 1. 5657 X 10 atom2/s, the corresponding diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 95.7 %, 84.2 %;95.7%, 81.6%;96.5 %, 84.2% and 93.9% ,84.2% ,respectively. ROC analysis showed that the AUC of D value was 0.91 which was the highest one. By combining D with MK value for diagnosis, AUC was increased to 0.92. Conclusion: The parameters obtained from IVIM- DKI model are helpful to differential diagnosis of benign from malignant breast lesions. The D value obtained from IVIM model may have relatively high sensitivity and specificity,D Combined with MK value can obtain the best diagnostic performance.
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2016年第12期1191-1195,共5页 Radiologic Practice
关键词 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 体素内不相干运动 扩散峰度成像 乳腺肿瘤 鉴别诊断 Diffusiowweighted Imaging Diffusion kurtosis imaging Intra-voxel incoherent motion Breast neo- plasm Differential diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献38

  • 1Moon M, Comfeld D, Weinreb J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging[J]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2009, 17(2): 351-362.
  • 2Pinker K, Bickel H, Helbich TH, et al. Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions[J]. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(7): 1791-1802.
  • 3Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, et al. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2008, 28(5): 1157-1165.
  • 4Tamura T, Usui S, Murakami S, et al. Comparisons of multi b-value DWI signal analysis with pathological specimen of breast cancer[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2012, 68(3): 890-897.
  • 5Yamada I, Aung W, Himeno Y, et al. Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 1999, 210(3): 617-623.
  • 6Pang Y, Turkbey B, Bemardo M, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: an evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b-value combinations[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2013, 69(2): 553-562.
  • 7Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Sumi T, et al. Salivary gland tumors: use of intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for assessment of diffusion and perfusion for the differentiation of benign from malignant tumors[J]. Radiology, 2012, 263(3): 770-777.
  • 8Lemke A, Lama FB, Klanss M, et al. Differentiation of pancreas carcinoma from healthy pancreatic tissue using multiple b-values: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion derived parameters[J]. Invest Radiol, 2009, 44(12): 769-775.
  • 9Lin C, Liang C, Liu Z, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: Comparison with cotaventional DWI[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(12): e782-789.
  • 10Sigrnund EE, Cho GY, Kim S, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2011, 65(5): 1437-1447.

共引文献52

同被引文献74

引证文献14

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部