摘要
《经籍假借字间诂》一文,孟蓬生先生用因声求义的方法,对经籍中19个假借字进行了考释,所释多极为精辟,为我们阅读古书、正确理解古义提供了巨大帮助。拜读数过,受益匪浅。然觉个别训释或有可商补的余地,如肆通贳、话通会、阻通籍、规通企、极通勀、力通亟,我们认为这几个假借字,有的词义是从本义引申而来,有的是因为古文句读不当从而导致假借说。
In the Exegetics of the Phonetic Loan Characters in Confucian Classics, Meng Pengsheng uses the method of ＂yinshengqiuyi（因声求义）＂, and gives interpretations on 19 phonetic loan char- acters in confucian classics. They are very insightful to help us reading ancient books and under-standing the ancient meanings. However, explanations on some phonetic loan characters need to ana- lyze again,such as si（肆） and shi（贳）,hua（话） and hui（会）,zu（阻） and ji（籍）,gui（规） and qi（企）,ji（极） and ke（勀）, li（力） and ji（亟）. We think that some meaning is extended from the original meaning, and some reading has impropriety in these phonetic loan characters.
出处
《中国文字研究》
CSSCI
2016年第2期177-180,共4页
The Study of Chinese Characters
关键词
本字
本义
假借字
引申义
the original form of a character
original meaning
phonetic loan character
extended meaning
