期刊文献+

合法与合理:应用型大学校企合作的分析模型与行动逻辑——基于组织社会学的构建 被引量:9

Legitimacy and Rationality:Analysis Model and Action Logic of College-enterprise Cooperation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 校企合作是高等院校,特别是应用性大学和高职院校与企业间进行的一种有效的培养、储备和获取人才的实践途径与手段。因而,对该领域的研究具有认识论和方法论的双重价值。校企双方对于合作环境诉求的差异造成了校企合作无法"无缝对接"。有效的校企合作状态可以从校企双方各自遵循的合法性原则和合理性原则出发,通过建立并使用强制趋同性、模仿趋同性和社会规范趋同性三种合法机制和成本—收益、权力—依赖、结构—诱致均衡三种合理机制,并通过主动的统一和被动的统一确保两套机制的有效协同,激发校企合作的效能,使校企双方实现双赢,最终达致"无缝对接"的理想合作状态。 College-enterprise cooperation between colleges, especially applied universities and higher vocational colleges and enterprises is a kind of effective ways and means which cultivates, reserves and acquiring talent. Therefore, the study of college-enterprisecooperation has the dual value of epistemology and methodology. The different demands for cooperation environment between the two sides of college-enterprise cooperation may not reach "seamless docking." The effective college-ente rprisecooperation can be conducted based on the principle of legitimacy and reasonableness followed by both sides of college and enterprise, by establishing and using three kinds of legal mechanism such as compulsory convergence, imitation convergence and social norm convergence and three kinds of reasonable mechanisms such as the balance of cost-benefit, power-reliance and structure-induction.Simultaneously, ensuring the two mechanisms coordinate with each other effectively via active unity and passive unity to stimulate the effectiveness of college-enterprise cooperation, so that both sides can achievea win-win situation, thus reach the ideal cooperation state of "seamless docking" ultimately.
作者 朱生营 王恒 ZHU Shengying WANG Heng(Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875 Beijing Union University, Beijing 100101)
出处 《现代教育管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第12期17-22,共6页 Modern Education Management
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划2014年度教育部重点课题"基于品牌协同的应用技术型大学特色资源类型识别与转化机制研究"(DFA140216)
关键词 校企合作 合法性 合理性 合法机制 合理机制 college-enterprise cooperation legality rationality legal mechanism reasonable mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘世定.嵌入性与关系合同[J].社会学研究,1999(4):77-90. 被引量:209
  • 2樊纲.两种改革成本与两种改革方式[J].经济研究,1993,28(1):3-15. 被引量:282
  • 3马健生.论教育改革方案的可接受性与可行性:公共选择的观点[J].北京大学教育评论,2004,2(4):108-111. 被引量:19
  • 4.国务院关于2005年深化经济体制改革的意见[N].人民日报,2005—04—18.
  • 5[德]哈贝马斯 郭官义译.重建历史唯物主义[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000..
  • 6[法]拉法耶 安延译.组织社会学[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000..
  • 7[德]哈贝马斯 刘北成 曹卫东译.合法化危机[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000..
  • 8Hanan, M. T. and Freeman, J. H. Where do organizational forms come from? [J]. Sociological Forum , 1,1(March), 1986.
  • 9Hannan, M. T. and Carroll,G. R. Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Comprition[M]. New York: Oxford University Press,1992.
  • 10Suchman, M. C. Managing Legitimacy :Strategic and Institutional Approches[J]. Academy of Management Review,20,3(July) ,1995.

共引文献189

同被引文献59

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部