期刊文献+

荷属东印度华人社会的自治与困境——以18—19世纪吧城公堂丧葬管理为中心 被引量:2

The Dilemma of Control: The Funeral Management of Chinese Communities in Batavia under the Dutch East India Company during the 18th and 19th Centuries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论文利用公堂审理华人民事案件和日常管理的档案记录《公案簿》和荷兰莱顿大学图书馆藏原始公堂数字化档案,从华人社会权力管制的视角对公堂的丧葬管理过程、华人丧葬规范以及丧葬背后体现的社会内在矛盾进行了研究探讨。1742年建立的吧城公堂是荷属东印度时期荷兰殖民者委任华人甲必丹管理的华人半自治机构,主要处理华人民政事务,其中丧葬事宜便是管理要务之一,包括倡建、购置和经营华人塚地,规范华人葬仪、丧服之礼。然而在西方殖民统治不断强化的时代背景下,公堂在丧葬管理中面临唐吧贸易衰落后甲必丹们义葬观念的转变、闽粤二帮祭祀矛盾、华人美色甘及公堂内部人士对塚地经费管理的质疑以及殖民政府推进城市化过程中对塚地的侵蚀等挑战,再加上1900年吧达维亚中华会馆成立后倡导革新婚丧旧俗,公堂的权威地位逐渐遭到削弱,华人社会管理多元化的诉求和实践成为时代需要。 Based on archival materials about Batavia and the digital archives at the Leiden University in the Netherland, this paper examines the process of funeral management including Chinese funeral customs and the social struggles reflected in the funeral ceremonies. During the Dutch East India period, Batavia Chinese Tribunal on funeral ceremony advocated the construction, acquisition and operation of Chinese graves, standardized Chinese funeral etiquette, appearance and sacrifice in more Fujianese society, adopted the Hokkien culture and Chinese Confucian culture to maintain social and economic orders, and established authority, but the Tribunal also faced the decline of China-Batavia trade, cuhural conflicts in funeral ceremony between the Fujianese and Cantonese communities, the problems of grave cost and reduced cemetery area caused by urbanization. Therefore, although Tribunal was a useful tool to rule Chinese by Dutch colonists, its functions were narrowed down due to various factors mentioned above.
作者 张小欣 ZHANG Xiao-xin(Academy of Overseas Chinese Studies, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China)
出处 《华侨华人历史研究》 CSSCI 2016年第4期1-9,共9页 Journal of Overseas Chinese History Studies
关键词 荷属东印度 吧达维亚 吧城公堂 华人自治 甲必丹 丧葬管理 Dutch East India Company Batavia Batavia Chinese Tribunal funeral management Chinese self-rule
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献4

  • 1乾隆年间议禁南洋贸易案史料[J].历史档案,2002,15(2):23-35. 被引量:4
  • 2欧·马·阿利普:《华人在马尼拉》,周南京译,载《中外关系史译丛》第1辑,上海译文出版社,1884年,第115页.
  • 3许云樵:《郑昭人贡清廷考》,载姚栅、许钰编译:《古代南洋史地从考》,商务印书馆,1958年,第50页.
  • 4陈荆和:《十七、十八世纪之会安唐人街及其商业》,《新亚学报》(香港)1957年第3卷第1期,第271-332页.

同被引文献5

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部