石里克语言分析与禅宗超语言

Analysis on Schlick's Language and Zen Transcending Language

自惠能以来的中国禅宗,无论是在自我修行的内在证悟方式上,还是在接引弟子时具有神秘主义色彩的手段上,皆闪烁着"不立文字"的影子。通过杜绝语言文字对真如妙法的曲解进而引导信徒透过内心之虔敬而到达智慧彼岸。相较于西方20世纪开始广泛流行的以石里克等人为代表的逻辑实证主义,在探究哲学与科学的发展前景时,提出对哲学问题进行语言分析,从而解决哲学体系中的形而上学问题,这与中国禅宗之"不立文字"似有相反而又相通之处。在双向研究禅宗的超语言逻辑与现代西方哲学语言分析路向的基础上,对二者通而不同之处进行研究,以求获得新解。

The wisdom of ＂no word＂ flourishes in Chinese Zenof self-cultured enlightenment or guiding disciples. It allowsBuddhism ever since Huineng era, whether in the wayfollowers to achieve wisdom by inner pietism withoutthe misleading from words. ＂No words＂ of the Chinese Zen seems to have dissimilitude but actually similarities withlogical positivism in exploring the development of philosophy and science which was put forward by Schlick in 20thcentury. This paper studies the differences between the Chinese Zen and logical positivism on transcending languagefor further understanding.