期刊文献+

大跨径钢桁架拱桥极限承载力影响因素分析 被引量:1

Analysis of Influencing Factors of Ultimate Carrying Capacity of Long Span Steel Truss Arch Bridge
下载PDF
导出
摘要 钢桁架拱桥的跨越能力强、造型美观且表现力丰富,在地质条件良好的条件下,其是理想的大跨度桥梁选择方案。以主跨240m的某大桥为工程背景,运用有限元方法计算其极限承载力,根据结构的边界条件、活载布置方式、初始缺陷及横向风荷载等因素发生变化,探究这些因素变化对桥梁极限承载力的影响。分析结果表明:拱脚位置活载最不利布载工况时,桥梁的极限承载力下降明显达14.3%,设计时需要着重验算分析此工况;横向风速的变化与桥梁极限承载能力大小之间呈现非线性关系。 Due to the steel truss arch bridge has a better performance in crossing ability,shapings and expression,it become an ideal choice for the long-span bridge type under a good geological condition. In this study,a bridge with 240 meters main span is considered as the engineering background. The finite element method is conducted for the calcula-tion of ultimate strength in this bridge. Based on the changes of the boundary condition,live load arrangement,initial defect,and transverse wind-load on the structure,this study indicates the influences in bridge ultimate strength. The an-alyzed results show that, the ultimate strength of bridge shows a dramatic decrease and it reaches 14.5%,when the worst live-load contributes on the arch springing. For this reason,this working condition need to be carefully checked in the design process. Moreover, there is a nonlinear relationship can be observed between the velocity change of transverse wind and the value of the ultimate live-load.
作者 汪凌斌
出处 《建材世界》 2016年第6期34-38,共5页 The World of Building Materials
关键词 钢桁架拱桥 有限元模型 极限承载力 影响因素 steel truss arch bridge finite model ultimate carrying capacity influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1Sadao Komatsu and Tatsuro Sakimoto. Ultimate loadcarrying capacity of steel arches[J]. Journal of the Structural Division. ASCE, 1977,103(ST12): 2323-2336.
  • 2JTG/TD60-01-2004.公路桥梁抗风设计规范[S].[S].,..
  • 3DAVENPORT A G. Gust Loading Factors[J]. Jour- nal of the Structural Division,1967,93(ST3): 11-34.
  • 4KASPERSKI M, NIEMANN H J. The L. R. C. (Load response-correlation)-method..A General Method of Esti mating Unfavorable Wind Load Distribution {or Line-ar and Non-linear Structural Behavior[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1992,43(1/2/3) 1753-1763.
  • 5HOLMES J D. Along-wind Response of Lattice Tow- ers- HI. Effective Load Distributions[J]. Engineering Structures, 1996,18(7) : 489-494.
  • 6ZHOU Y,GU M, XIANG H F. Along Wind Static Equivalent Wind Loads and Responses of Tall Build- ings. Part I.. Unfavorable Distributions of Sstatic Equivalent Wind Loads[J]. Journal of Wind Engineer- ing and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999,79 ( 1/2 ) : 135- 150.
  • 7ZHOU Y, GU M, XIANG H F. Alongwind Static Equivalent Wind Loads and Responses of Tall Build- ings. Part 11 : Effects of Mode Shapes[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1999,79 (1/2) : 151-158.
  • 8CHEN X,KAREEM A. Equivalent Static Wind Loads for Buffeting Response of Bridges [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2001,127(12) : 1467-1475.
  • 9KATSUMURA A, TAMURA Y, NAKAMURA O. Universal Wind Load Distribution Simultaneously Re- producing Largest Load Effects in All Subject Mem- bers on Large-span Cantilevered Roof[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2007,95(9/10/11) .. 1145-1165.
  • 10JAIN A, JONES N P, SCANLAN R H. Coupled Aeroelastic and Aerodynamic Response Analysis of Long-span Bridges [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1996,60 : 69-80.

共引文献27

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部