1Shayer, M Mot justp iaget; not just Vygotsky, and certainly not Vygotsky as alternative to Piaget [J]. Learning and Instruction,2003,13,465 -485.
2DeVries, R Vygoysky, Piaget, and education; a reciprocal assimilation of theories and educational practices[J]. New ideas in Psychology, 2000,18,187 - 213.
3Piaget, J Chance and dialectic in biological epistemology [A].Overton, W F Knowledge and development: Advances in research and Theory[C]. New York:plenum, 1997. 241 - 308.
4Donald, R Designing Learning Experiences within Learners'Zones of Proximal Development:Enabling Collaborative Learning On-Site and Online[J]. Journal of Information Systems, 2003,17 ( 1 ) : 107 -134.
5Wertsch, J V Vygotsky and Contemporary Developmental Psychology[A]. Lloyd, P, Fernyhough, C Vygotsky Critical Assessment[C]. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.26 -58.
6Dalgarno, B Interpretation of constructivism and consequences for Computer Assisted Learning [J]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2001,32(2) : 183 - 194.
7Wink,J ,Putney, L A Vision of Vygotsky[ M]. Allyn and Baeon:A Pearson Education Company,2002.85- 115.
8Glassman, M The difference between Piaget and Vygoysky: a response to Duncan[J]. Developmental Review, 1995,15,473 - 482.
9Leslie P . Steffe & Jerry Gale . Constructivism in Education Lawrence, Erlbaum Associates, 1995.
10Dewey. J.. How we think[M] Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin Company, 1998.
