期刊文献+

未成年人侵权责任承担之立法考量

Legislative Considerations on Juveniles' Taking Responsibilities for Tort
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,未成年人侵权事件频发,我国立法又凸显出未成年人侵权方面的不足,过多考虑受害人的利益保护,缺乏对未成年人侵权责任能力及归责原则的法律评价,一味采用监护人无过错的替代责任,致使未成年人侵权责任的追究与受害人利益保护之间未能达到平衡。立法应基于自由意志理论,明确未成年人可作为侵权责任的独立承担主体及过错归责原则、损害赔偿来源等相关内容。 In recent years, there have been frequent tort events by juveniles. Chinese legislation shows obvious lack in the regulations against tort events by juveniles. We have considered too much about protecting victims' rights, but lack have not conducted evaluation on juvenile's ability to take responsibilities for tort as well as the principles for judging legal responsibilities, we have merely focused on supervisors' no-fauh responsibility, which has caused the unbalance between the investigation of juveniles' tort responsibilities and the protection of victims' interests. Legislation should be based on the theory of free will, and we should make clear the following content, including juveniles' being able to independently take tort responsibilities, principles for judging legal responsibilities, and sources for compensation, and so on.
作者 强舒琦 QIANG Shu-qi(College of Postgraduate Education, East China University of Politics and Law, Shanghai, 200042, Chin)
出处 《山西青年职业学院学报》 2016年第3期59-62,共4页 Journal of Shanxi Youth Vocational College
关键词 未成年人 侵权责任 侵权主体 过错 juvenile tort responsibility tort subject fault
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献28

  • 1[德]汉斯·普维庭 吴越 译.现代证明责任问题[M].北京:法律出版社,2000..
  • 2Glanville Williams& B.A. Hepple. Foundations of the Law of Torts [M]. London: Butterworths, 1984.
  • 3邱聪智.[D].台北:台湾大学法律学研究所,1982.
  • 4Clerk. Lindsell on Torts [M]. London: Sweet&Maxwell, 1989.
  • 5John G. Fleming, An Evaluation of The Fault Concept, 32. Tenn. L. Rev. (1964-1965).
  • 6R. F. V. Heuston & R. A. Buskley. Salmond and Heuston on the Law of Torts [M]. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1992.
  • 7William L. Prosser. Handbook of The Law of Torts [M]. West Publishing Co, 1971.
  • 8[美]罗伯特·考特 托马斯·尤伦.张军等.法和经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1995..
  • 9Billings & Son v. Riden [1958] A. C. 240, 255, per Lord Reid.
  • 10Byrne v. Boaclle 2 H. &C. 722, 159Eng. Rep. 299 (Ex. 1863) (SATL 335).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部