《古本难经阐注》之“古本”系宋元时期吴澄校定本考

The Ancient Book <Gu Ben Nan Jing Chan Zhu> Is Really An Ancient Copy of Wu Cheng in Song and Yuan Dynasties

[目的]考察清代丁锦《古本难经阐注》一书中所称"古本"的真实性。[方法]寻找《古本难经阐注》与《难经阐注》经文顺序所蕴含的规律,与传世文献中相关记载进行对比研究,确定《古本难经阐注》所称"古本"的真实性。[结果]《古本难经阐注》所称"古本",实为宋元时期经学大家吴澄所校定本《难经》,丁锦在吴澄的基础上删去序文及篇名,并篡改吴氏所分六篇为四卷,才形成了《古本难经阐注》一书。[结论]吴澄作为经学大家,以经学之力校定《难经》,其校定文字等内容不仅资为《难经》校勘的参考,更是作为《难经》的古传本,为《难经》研究提供了版本依据,故其价值不仅高于明清注本之上,更可直追吕广、杨玄操二氏,对《难经》的辑复、校勘等工作都将具有十分重要的意义。

[Objective] To investigate the book 〈Gu Ben Nan Jing Chart Zhu〉 written by Ding Jin, is it really ancient copies of 〈Nan Jing〉？[Methods] Relative to 〈Nan Jing〉,the sequence of the articles in 〈Gu Ben Nan Jing Chan Zhu〉 has been adjusted following some regularity. Find the regularity and comparison with other historical literature recordation.[Resuts] 〈Gu Ben Nan Jing Chan Zhu〉 is based on 〈 Nan Jing 〉 revised by Wu Cheng in Song and Yaan dynasties, removing preface and title, and turning six chapters to four chapters.[Conclusion] Absolutely, 〈 Nan Jing 〉 revised by Wu Cheng has an important value as a new edition and a research reference of 〈Nan Jing〉,we should sort it out from 〈Gu Ben Nan Jing Chan Zhu〉,and make an in-depth study.