期刊文献+

全胸腔镜支气管袖式肺叶切除术治疗中央型肺癌的疗效 被引量:3

Efficacy of complete video-assisted thoracic surgery of bronchus sleeve lobectomy in treating central type lung cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨全胸腔镜支气管袖式肺叶切除术治疗中央型肺癌的疗效及安全性。方法中央型非小细胞肺癌患者30例,9例采用全胸腔镜支气管袖式肺叶切除术(微创组),21例行开胸支气管袖式肺叶切除术(开胸组)。比较两组手术相关资料、术后疼痛评分及并发症发生情况。结果两组肿瘤直径、淋巴结总数、淋巴结组数、病理类型、病理分期、肺切除类型、手术时间、术中出血量及胸腔引流量比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与开胸组比较,微创组术后1d及3d疼痛评分较低(P<0.05)。微创组患者胸腔引流置管时间和术后住院时间均短于开胸组(P<0.05)。术后并发症:开胸组8例,微创组2例。结论全胸腔镜支气管袖式肺叶切除术治疗中央型肺癌安全、可行,较开胸手术患者术后疼痛轻、住院时间短。 Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of complete video-assisted thoracic surgery(VATS)of bronchus sleeve lobectomy in the treatment of central type lung cancer.Methods The bronchus sleeve lobectomy was performed in 30 patients with central type lung cancer,of whom 9cases were operated by VATS(group A)and 21 cases by open surgery(group B).The surgery-related data,postoperative pain score and complications were compared between two groups.Results There were no statistical differences in tumor diameter,total number of lymph nodes and lymph node group,pathological type and stage,operation time,intraoperative blood loss and the amount of thoracic cavity drainage between two groups(P〉0.05).Compared to group B,the postoperative pain scores on the1 st and 3rd day after operation were lower,the withdrawl of drainage tube was earlier and postoperative hospital stay was shorter in group A(P〈0.05).The postoperative complications occurred in 2cases of group A and in 8cases of group B.Conclusion Compared with open-surgery,bronchus sleeve lobectomy under VATS is effective and safe.Compared to open surgery,bronchus sleeve lobectomy under VATS has the advantages of less postoperative pain and shorter postoperative hospital stay.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 2016年第24期2692-2695,共4页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 肺癌 胸腔镜 支气管袖式肺叶切除术 Lung cancer Video-assisted thoracic surgery Bronchus sleeve lobectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1何建行,杨运有,陈汉章,吴哲凡,韦兵,邵文龙,殷伟强,杨德康.胸腔镜辅助小切口肺血管/支气管成形术治疗肺肿瘤[J].中国肺癌杂志,2007,10(4):301-305. 被引量:11
  • 2唐雯,陈爱祖.顾客满意度测评中的问卷检验[J].数理统计与管理,2005,24(1):58-61. 被引量:36
  • 3董伊人,陶鹏德.病人满意度影响因素的统计分析[J].数理统计与管理,2005,24(1):116-120. 被引量:64
  • 4汪向东.心理卫生评定手册[M].北京:中国心理杂志社,1999..
  • 5吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.12-61.
  • 6Yuen TS,Irwin MG.The "fifth vital sign".Hong Kong Med J.2005 Jun;11(3):145-146.
  • 7Comley AL,DeMeyer E.Assessing patient satisfaction with pain management through a continuous quality improvement effort.J Pain Symptom Manage.2001 Jan;21(1):27-40.
  • 8Chung JW,Lui JC.Postoperative pain management:study of patients' level of pain and satisfaction with health care providers' responsiveness to their reports of pain.Nurs Health Sci.2003 Mar;5(1):13-21.
  • 9McNeill J,Sherwood G,Starck P,et al.Design strategies in pain management research with Hispanics.Hispanic Health Care International.2003,2(2):73-80.
  • 10Sherwood GD,McNeill J,Palos G,et al.Perspectives on pain:A qualitative analysis of the Hispanic pain experience.NT Research.2003,8(5):364-377.

共引文献251

同被引文献39

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部