期刊文献+

军校本科学员自我领导、自我效能与个体创新能力的关系研究——基于某军校的实证分析 被引量:2

A Research on the Relationship among Undergraduates' Self-leadership,Self-efficacy and Individual Innovation Ability:an Empirical Analysis of a Military Academy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 军校本科学员较普通高校本科学生在管理模式、生活方式等方面存在很大不同,学员在自我领导、自我效能、个体创新能力等方面也呈现诸多不同特点。研究发现:学员自我领导能力整体水平较高,自我效能处于中等偏上水平,个体创新能力整体水平一般;个人背景项在自我领导、自我效能和个体创新能力部分因子上的差异具有统计学意义;自我领导、自我效能、个体创新能力三个维度因子之间相关性差异具有统计学意义,具体来说,自我惩罚因子与各因子之间呈负相关关系,其余因子之间均为正相关关系;进一步回归分析表明,自我效能在自我领导影响个体创新能力过程中充当中介变量。军校教员和相关管理者应该着重推动自我领导课程建设,采取适当方式鼓励创新,重视自我效能测评并改进骨干选配方式。 There are some differences between undergraduates in military academies and common colleges about management mode, life style and so on. Cadets also have many different characteristics in self-leadership, self-efficacy and individual innovation ability. The result shows that the level of self- leadership is high, the level of self-efficacy is above the average, and the level of the individual innovation ability is general ; the differences of personal background on self-leadership, self-efficacy and individual innovation ability are statistically significant; the differences among self-leadership, self-efficacy and individual innovation ability are statistically significant. In particular, there are negative relationships between punishment factors and the others, and there are positive relationships among the rest factors; self-efficacy is the intermediary variable in the process of individual innovation ability affected by self-leadership through regression analysis. Military teachers and related managers should focus on promoting the construction of self-leadership courses, taking appropriate ways to encourage innovation, paying attention to the evaluation of self-efficacy and improving the cadres' selection methods.
出处 《高等教育研究学报》 2016年第4期9-15,共7页 Journal of Higher Education Research
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划教育部青年课题(EIA130405)
关键词 军校本科学员 自我领导 自我效能 个体创新能力 military undergraduates self-leadership self-efficacy individual innovation ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献55

  • 1翁文艳,房欲飞.当代美国大学生领导力教育成功经验分析[J].中国青年政治学院学报,2007,26(2):7-11. 被引量:81
  • 2伯顿 克拉克.高等教育系统[M].杭州:杭州大学出版社,1994..
  • 3[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 4[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 5[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 6[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 7[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 8[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 9[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 10[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64

共引文献7647

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部