期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗宫颈癌的疗效比较 被引量:4

Comparison of the efficacy between laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of cervical cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗宫颈癌的临床疗效。方法收集该院收治的88例宫颈癌患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组44例。观察组采用腹腔镜下手术,对照组采用开腹手术,比较两组患者的手术效果及术后并发症情况等。结果观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结个数、输血例数、排气时间、尿管留置天数、住院天数、并发症等方面均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论腹腔镜治疗宫颈癌,创伤小、出血量少,术后恢复快、住院时间短、改善预后、安全可行、疗效可靠,具有临床推广价值。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy between laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of cervical cancer. Methods Eighty-eight cases with cervical cancer were randomly divided into the observation group( n = 44) receiving laparoscopic surgery and the control group( n = 44) receiving open surgery. The surgical results and the postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results The operative time,the blood loss,the number of lympn nodes,the blood transfusion rate,the anal exhaust time,the time for indwelling catheter,the days of hospital stay and the incidence of complications in the observation group were significantly less or lower than those in the control group( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Laparoscopy is safe and effective in the treatment of cervical cancer.
作者 梁洁
出处 《中国临床新医学》 2016年第12期1139-1141,共3页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
关键词 腹腔镜 开腹手术 宫颈癌 治疗效果 Laparoscopy Laparotomy Cervical cancer Treatment effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献70

  • 1李天祥.围手术期患者的心理干预[J].南华大学学报(医学版),2005,33(2):264-265. 被引量:11
  • 2史玉林,牛菊敏,赵红,汪桂兰.腹腔镜手术治疗子宫恶性肿瘤72例临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(11):669-671. 被引量:23
  • 3吴阶平 裘法祖.黄家驷外科学[M]第6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.2126-2133.
  • 4范吉利,商志远.腹腔镜胃十二指肠溃疡穿孔修补术30例分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2007,13(7):781-781. 被引量:17
  • 5南充医学专科学校.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1981:207-208.
  • 6曹伟新.外科护理学[M].北京:人民卫生生出版社,2004.380.
  • 7郑修霞,夏海鸥.妇产科护理学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:253.
  • 8Beiner E,Hauspy M,Rosen F,et al. Radical vaginal trachefecto-my VS .radical hysterectomy for small eariy stage cervical cancer.A matched casecontrol study[J].Gynecol Oncol,2008,110(2): 167-171.
  • 9Maggioni A,Minig L,Zanagnolo V,et al.Robotic approach for cervical cancer. comparison with laparotomy: a case contml study[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2009,115(1):60-64.
  • 10Kavallaris A, Homemann A,Chalvatzas N, et al, Laparoscopic nerve- sparing radical hysterectomy.description Of the technique and patients'outcome[J].Gynecol Oncol,2010,119(2): 198-201.

共引文献38

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部