期刊文献+

如何通过集体协商达成社区公共品的合作治理——以蛇口翠竹园小区加装电梯为例 被引量:9

How to Obtain Collaborative Governance of Community Public Goods through Collective Bargaining: Adding Elevators to Existing Residential Buildings at a Shekou Community
下载PDF
导出
摘要 城市既有多层住宅楼建造时多未装电梯,随着住户年龄增长,上下楼梯极不方便,加装电梯成了这部分住户的"刚需"。面对政府各部门的政策限制和各楼层住户之间协商的重重困难,在主流经济学理论框架下选择"搭便车(free-ride)"而非合作是纳什均衡。但是现实中观察到蛇口翠竹园5栋住户历经集体协商数十次、前后奔走三年多,成为深圳老旧住宅加装电梯的首个成功案例。以理论与现实的反差为切入口,在实地调研和访谈的基础上,尝试解释这些住户们如何通过自愿的集体协商、通过各种利益补偿,形成一致契约,达成合作治理,使得原本理论上无解的问题出现了新的转机,为此类城市社区公共品的业主自发协商、自愿供给提供一种可行路径。 Not every high-rise residential building is equipped with elevators in the first place. As residents are getting older, going up and down becomes a huge problem for them and these people are in rigid demand for elevators. Due to limitations of government policies and difficulties in getting all the residents approvals for the additional installation, free-ride instead of collaboration become the Nash equilibrium under the framework of mainstream economic theories. But the case of Shekou's Cuizuyuan residential community has proved feasible after three years of collective bargaining among residents of five buildings and has become the first successful case of this kind in Shenzhen. Focusing on the gap between theory and practice and based on field research and interviews, the paper tries to explain how the agreement was reached through voluntary collective bargaining and benefit compensation. This successful experience also provide a reference for the collaborative governance of similar community public goods.
作者 章平 刘宇飞
出处 《城市观察》 2016年第6期96-103,共8页 Urban Insight
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(71203145)"公共品自愿供给中的社会偏好与惩罚机制研究"
关键词 加装电梯 集体协商 合作治理 additional installation of elevator collective bargaining collaborative gover-nance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1曹嘉明,梁士毅.多层住宅安装电梯浅析[J].建筑学报,2003(9):22-23. 被引量:6
  • 2曹志锡,陈德生.现有多层住宅加装电梯的可行性分析[J].起重运输机械,2005(6):42-43. 被引量:7
  • 3李瑞礼.多层住宅增设电梯的意义[J].住宅科技,2005,25(12):43-45. 被引量:6
  • 4夏令.旧楼又有望依法装电梯[N].信息时报,2010-7-22(A17).
  • 5杨永敏,周锡银,肖春道.旧楼业主盼装电梯华鞍花园-旧楼加装电梯的样本[N].海峡都市报,2011-04-08.
  • 6Thomas L. Saaty and Joyce M. Alexander. Conflict Resolution The Analytic Hierarchy Approach[ M ]. Greenwood Press, 1999.
  • 7Fehr Emsl, Simon Gachter. Cooperation and Punish- ment in Public Goods Experiments[J]. Ameriean Economic Re- view, 2000, 90(4) : 980 -994.
  • 8Casari, Marco, Luigi Luini. Peer Punishment in Teams: Expressive Or Instrumental Choice? [J]. Experimental Economics, 2012, 15 ( 2 ) : 241 - 259.
  • 9Nikilbrakis, Nikos. Punishment and Counter - Punish- merit in Public Good Games: Can we Really Govern Ourselves? [J]. Journal of Public Economies, 2008, 92 ( 1 - 2) :91 - 112.
  • 10Herrmann, Benedikt, Christian Thoni, Simon Gaehter. Antisocial Punishment Across Societies[J]. Science, 2008, 319(5868) :1362 - 1367.

共引文献53

同被引文献94

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部