期刊文献+

Chemical Composition and Bioactivity of Lippia adoensis Hochst ex.Walp(Verneneaceae) Leaf Essential Oil Against Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Chemical Composition and Bioactivity of Lippia adoensis Hochst ex.Walp(Verneneaceae) Leaf Essential Oil Against Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Essential oil (EO) of Nigeria-grown Lippia adoensis leaf was analyzed using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) and its fumigant and repellent properties against Callosobruchus maculatus were evaluated. Sixteen compounds predominated by monoterpenes were identified. The major compounds were Eucalyptol (28.36%), α-Terpineol (25.99%), γ-Terpinene (15.24%), α-Pinene (5.08%), 1H-Cyclopropa[a]naphthalene (4.25%) and 1, 3, 6, 10-Dodeeatetraene (3.74%). Percentage mortality due to fumigant toxicity was dose- and exposure period-dependent. One hour after treatment (HAT), application of L. adoensis leaf EO at 107 μL· L^-1 air caused significantly (p〈0.05) higher mortality (50.00%) than 0.00% mortality observed at 0-53 μL· L^-1 air, but not significantly (p〉0.05) different from 22.50% observed in 80 μL· L^-1 air. At 3 HAT, application ofL. adoensis EO at 80 μL· L^-1 air caused significantly higher mortality (90.00 %) than mortality observed at 0 μL· L^-1 air. At 6 HAT, application of L. adoensis EO at 53-107 μL· L^-1 air caused significantly higher mortality (100.00 %) than that was observed in the control. The same trend was observed at 12 HAT where 100 % mortality observed in 27-107 μL· L^-1 air was significantly greater than 13.33 % observed in the control. At 3 HAT, percentage repellence was significantly (p〈0.05) affected by doses. Application of EO at 10-30 μL· cm^2 caused class V repellence (86.67%-100%) compared with the control which caused class I repellence (0-20%). Essential oil (EO) of Nigeria-grown Lippia adoensis leaf was analyzed using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) and its fumigant and repellent properties against Callosobruchus maculatus were evaluated. Sixteen compounds predominated by monoterpenes were identified. The major compounds were Eucalyptol (28.36%), α-Terpineol (25.99%), γ-Terpinene (15.24%), α-Pinene (5.08%), 1H-Cyclopropa[a]naphthalene (4.25%) and 1, 3, 6, 10-Dodeeatetraene (3.74%). Percentage mortality due to fumigant toxicity was dose- and exposure period-dependent. One hour after treatment (HAT), application of L. adoensis leaf EO at 107 μL· L^-1 air caused significantly (p〈0.05) higher mortality (50.00%) than 0.00% mortality observed at 0-53 μL· L^-1 air, but not significantly (p〉0.05) different from 22.50% observed in 80 μL· L^-1 air. At 3 HAT, application ofL. adoensis EO at 80 μL· L^-1 air caused significantly higher mortality (90.00 %) than mortality observed at 0 μL· L^-1 air. At 6 HAT, application of L. adoensis EO at 53-107 μL· L^-1 air caused significantly higher mortality (100.00 %) than that was observed in the control. The same trend was observed at 12 HAT where 100 % mortality observed in 27-107 μL· L^-1 air was significantly greater than 13.33 % observed in the control. At 3 HAT, percentage repellence was significantly (p〈0.05) affected by doses. Application of EO at 10-30 μL· cm^2 caused class V repellence (86.67%-100%) compared with the control which caused class I repellence (0-20%).
出处 《Journal of Northeast Agricultural University(English Edition)》 CAS 2016年第4期8-14,共7页 东北农业大学学报(英文版)
基金 Supported by the Senate of Ladoke Akintola University of Technology(LAUTECH) Ogbomoso,Nigeria Under the University Senate Research(LAU/SRG/13/045)
关键词 Lippia adoensis Callosobruchus maculatus GCMS bioactivity repellence FUMIGANT Lippia adoensis, Callosobruchus maculatus, GCMS, bioactivity, repellence, fumigant
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部