“后艺术”时代“艺术终结论”再思考

Considerations on the "End of Art" in "Post-art" Era

黑格尔、丹托等人关于艺术终将解体的看法有一定道理,但不是走向宗教、走向终结,而是走向"后艺术"。"后艺术"给我们这样的启迪:独立的、纯粹的艺术作为一个历史阶段,确实终将消亡。当生产劳动变成了社会生活的同义语时,起源于生产劳动的艺术将重归生产劳动。独立的、传统的、纯粹的艺术将只剩下指导的意义,取而代之的将是无所不在、无人不能的美化环境、美化人生的"日常生活审美化"。"后艺术"所具有的"去审美化""去深度化"和"情感消解"等表征,其实质是形而上的价值、观念等因素在当下艺术中的缺失与消解,这是"后艺术"时代的艺术之殇。在今天由大众来当家作主,决定看与不看、买与不买的消费社会里,艺术的命运究竟发生了什么样的变迁?其经济资助结构在我们的社会里又应该如何定位?这些问题,对于破解"后艺术"时代的艺术终结论困惑,无疑是值得认真思索的。

The view of Hegel, Danto etc. that the art will eventually disintegrate is reasonable, while the art dose not trend to the religion nor the end, but to the ＂post -art＂. The ＂post -art＂ give us the inspiration： the independent, pure art as a historical stage does eventually die. When the productive labor becomes the synonym of the social life, the art which originated from the productive labor will return to the productive labor. The independent, traditional, pure art has the directive significance only, while the ＂aesthetics of daily life＂ would be ubiquitous. The ＂elimination of the aesthetic＂ and the ＂elimination of depth＂ as well as the ＂emotional digestion＂ of the ＂post -art＂ are essentially the deletion and deconstruction of the metaphysical value and concepts in present art. In today＇ s consumption society, where the public has the decision - making power,what has happened on the fate of the art, and how does it transfer？ How could we locate the financial assistance structure in our society？ All the questions should be studied seriously.