摘要
如何填补不公平条款被认定后留下的漏洞,是法学界讨论较少的理论问题。目前存在的三种标准分别是最合理条款、惩罚性条款、最小容忍条款。最小容忍条款标准符合合同自由的基本理念,其他两个标准则否。惩罚性条款标准只有基于威慑功能才有适用空间。最合理条款标准本质上具有惩罚性且不完全合乎效率。最小容忍标准则符合效率。最合理条款标准如以语境中理性人为基础,其与最小容忍条款标准完全一致。《劳动合同法》及《担保法司法解释》等法律事实上确立了最小容忍条款标准,既有的大量民间借贷利率、违约金过高调整等判例也主要体现该标准。最小容忍条款标准应成为不公平合同条款认定后漏洞弥补的一般性标准。
The statement of the parties is only divided into evidential significance and non- evidential significance according to the existing research. The statement of the parties in civil procedure law also presents the predicament of the systematic clutter and the weakening of corresponding system function. In order to improve the condition of statements of the parties and ensure the implementation of the parties' speech right in the civil lawsuit,the legitimacy of litigant's statement system is imperative in our country. In the legislation,litigant's statement system should be further perfected to have the functions of expounding case and proving the case's facts. In the concrete implementation of the system,litigant's statement with different system functions should be set up to have the corresponding program mechanism.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期129-142,共14页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"十六年来我国合同法总则核心制度的司法适用与理论反思"(15AFX017)的阶段性成果