期刊文献+

临时关节型抗生素骨水泥占位器治疗人工髋关节置换术后感染30例临床分析 被引量:5

Temporary joint type antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer in the treatment of infection after total hip arthroplasty in 30 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨临时关节型抗生素骨水泥占位器在人工髋关节置换术后感染治疗中的临床效果。方法人工髋关节置换术后发生感染患者30例(30髋),随机分为对照组和观察组各15例,对照组应用灌注冲洗型占位器治疗,观察组应用抗生素骨水泥占位器治疗。比较2组占位器植入手术时间、术中出血量、术后卧床时间、住院时间;分别于下床第1天及二期翻修术前1d评定2组美国特种外科医院膝关节功能评分(hospital for special surgery knee score,HSS),测定髋关节活动度;比较2组治疗满意度。结果观察组占位器植入手术时间[(2.50±0.30)h]、术后卧床时间[(6.20±0.72)d]及住院时间[(25.83±3.20)d]较对照组[(3.31±0.28)h、(45.29±5.10)d、(53.15±4.92)d]短,术中出血量[(1 215.18±121.86)mL]较对照组[(2 122.87±204.28)mL]少(P<0.05);观察组下床第1天HSS评分[(56.92±5.17)分]、关节活动度[(49.75±4.21)°]与对照组[(56.03±5.39)分、(42.91±4.13)°]比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);二期翻修术前1d,观察组HSS评分[(87.82±7.89)分]高于对照组[(79.31±8.04)分](P<0.05),关节活动度[(67.23±4.91)°]与对照组[(57.31±4.74)°]比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组治疗总体满意率(93.3%)高于对照组(80.0%)(P<0.05),术后感染复发率(0)低于对照组(20.0%)(P<0.05)。结论临时关节型抗生素骨水泥占位器治疗人工髋关节置换术后感染可缩短占位器植入手术时间、术后卧床及住院时间,减少术中出血量,且与周围组织融合好,对关节功能影响小,患者满意度高。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of temporary joint type antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer on infection after total hip arthroplasty.Methods Thirty patients with infection after hip arthroplasty(30hips)were randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 15 patients in each group.Control group was treated with perfusion spacer and observation group was treated with antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer.The operation lasting time,intraoperative blood loss volume,postoperative bed time and hospitalization stay were compared between two groups.The hospital for special surgery knee score(HSS)was assessed on the first day after getting out of bed and the day before two-stage revision arthroplasty,and the range of motion was determined.The treatment satisfaction was compared between two groups.Results The operation lasting time((2.50±0.30)h),postoperative bed time((6.20±0.72)d)and hospitalization stay((25.83±3.20)d)in observation group were significantly shorter than those in control group((3.31±0.28)h,(45.29±5.10)d,(53.15±4.92)d),and blood loss volume in observation group((1 215.18±121.86)mL)was significantly less than that in control group((2 122.87±204.28)mL)(P〈0.05).There were no significant differences in the HSS score((56.92±5.17)min)vs(56.03±5.39)and range of motion((49.75±4.21)°vs(42.91± 4.13)°)between observation group and control group on the first day after getting out of bed(P〉0.05).On the first day before two-stage revision arthroplasty,the HSS score was significantly higher in observation group(87.82 ±7.89)than that in control group(79.31±8.04)(P〈0.05),and there was no significant difference in the range of motion between observation group((67.23±4.91)°)and control group((57.31±4.74)°)(P〉0.05).The patients'satisfaction rate was significantly higher and postoperative infection recurrence rate was significantly lower in observation group(93.3%,0)than those in control group(80.0%,20.0%)(P〈0.05).Conclusion Temporary joint type of antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer can shorten the operation lasting time,postoperative bed time and hospitalization stay after artificial hip replacement,reduce the intraoperative blood loss volume,and integrate well with surrounding tissues,with little influence on joint function and high patient satisfaction.
出处 《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》 2016年第12期1196-1198,共3页 Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
基金 云南省教育厅科学研究基金(2014Z128)
关键词 人工髋关节置换手术 术后感染 临时关节型抗生素骨水泥占位器 Artificial hip joint replacement surgery postoperative infection temporary joint type antibiotic-impregnated cement spaur
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1陈东峰,余楠生,卢伟杰,白波.低分子肝素联合间歇充气加压预防人工关节置换术后下肢深静脉血栓形成[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(12):823-826. 被引量:98
  • 2卢世璧,王继芳,王岩,等.坎贝尔骨科手术学[M].0版.济南:山东科技出版社,2005:373.
  • 3Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner P E. Prostheticqoint infections[J]. NEnglJ Med,2004,351(16):1645-1654.
  • 4Peel T N, Buising K L, Choong P F. Prosthetic joint infection: challenges of diagnosis and treatment[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2011,81 (1/2):32-39.
  • 5Bergin P F, Doppelt J D, Hamilton W G, et al. Detection of periprosthetic infections with use of ribosomal RNA-based polymerase chain reaction[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010,92 (3) :654-663.
  • 6Ghane E, Antoci V J, Pulido L, et al. The use of receiver operating characteristics analysis in determining erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein levels in diagnosing periprosthetic infection prior to revision total hip arthroplasty [J]. Int J Infect Dis,2009,13(6):444-449.
  • 7Greidanus N V, Masri B A, Garbuz D S, et al. Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty: a prospective evaluation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007,89(7): 1409-1416.
  • 8Ghanem E, Parvizi J, Burnett R S, et al. Cell count and differential of aspirated fluid in the diagnosis of infection at the site of total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90(8) : 1637-1643.
  • 9Bedair H, Ting N, Jacovides C, et al. The Mark Coventry Award: diagnosis of early postoperative TKA infection using synovial fluid analysis[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2011,469(1): 34-40.
  • 10Pill S G, Parvizi J, Tang P H. Comparison of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and (111) indium-white blood cell imaging in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection of the hip[J].J Arthroplasty,2006,21(6):91-97.

共引文献27

同被引文献59

引证文献5

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部