摘要
陪审制度主要有两种不同模式,即陪审团模式和参审制模式,两种模式在制度运作、审理范围和审理成本、文化传统上有很大的不同。对我国来说,借鉴英美法系陪审团制度的优点,克服参审制的弊端,可以从九个方面借鉴域外的陪审制度,进一步推进庭审的实质化,发挥陪审制度的民主、监督、人道功能,提高司法公信力。
There are two kinds of modes for the jury system, namely the jury mode and the assessor mode, which are very different in system operation, the trial scope, the trial cost, and cultural tradition. For our country, we can learn from the advantages of the jury mode and overcome the drawbacks of assessor mode. By referring to the nine aspects of foreign jury system, we will further promote the essence of the trial, enable the jury system to play it's role in democracy, supervision, and humanity, and improve the credibility of justice.
出处
《北京政法职业学院学报》
2016年第4期75-82,共8页
Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
基金
2015年最高人民法院重大审判理论课题<人民陪审员制度改革研究>的阶段性研究成果
关键词
陪审
制度
模式
评介
差异
镜鉴
jury
system
model
review
difference
reference