期刊文献+

高校工科教师绩效评价研究的AHP方法—兼论基于胜任力的绩效评价与职称评价 被引量:4

Application of AHP Method on Performance Evaluation of Engineering Teachers in Universities——Concurrently on Performance Evaluation Based on Competency Evaluation and Title Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "卓越工程师教育培养计划"下高校工科教师绩效评价是高校人力资源管理体系的重要组成部分。本文在分析高校教师绩效评价的内涵和研究现状的基础上,依据胜任力冰山模型理论,着重从素质、知识、教学和科研能力以及个人特质四个方面建立绩效层次结构图,并运用层次分析(AHP)法对工科教师的绩效进行评价,并在高校工科教师胜任力测评的基础上对绩效评价与职称评价的关系进行深入分析,以期对"卓越计划"下高校工科教师绩效评价指标体系的构建提供借鉴。 Performance evaluation of engineering teachers under the "Plan for Educating and Training Outstanding Engineers"(PETOE) is an important part of the human resources management.. Having analyzed the connotation and current research, in accordance with the iceberg model theory, performance hierarchy system is established from four aspeets of quality, knowledge, teaching and research capabilities and personal qualities as well. In addition, analytic hierarchy process (AHP)method is applied to evaluate the performance of engineering teachers. On the basis of the results of competency evaluation of engineering teachers, performance evaluation and title evaluation are analyzed in depth to establish the performance evaluation system for reference in universities.
出处 《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》 2016年第6期120-127,共8页 Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金教育学一般课题"面向"中国制造2025"的高等工程教育转型发展研究"(项目编号:BIA160101)
关键词 高校工科教师 层次分析法(AHP) 绩效评价与职称评价 engineering teachers in universities analytical hierarchy process (AHP) performance evaluation and title evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献27

  • 1鲁洁.教育:人之自我建构的实践活动[J].教育研究,1998,19(9):13-18. 被引量:299
  • 2高凌飚.过程性评价的理念和功能[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2004(6):102-106. 被引量:314
  • 3林杰.美国大学教师发展运动的历程、理论与组织[J].比较教育研究,2006,27(12):30-34. 被引量:41
  • 4菲利普·沃尔夫.欧洲的觉醒[M].北京:商务印书馆,1990.
  • 5Simpson, R. O., Jackson, W. K. A Muhidimensional Holistic Approach to Faculty Renewal [A]. D. W. Wheeler & Associates. Enhancing faculty careem : Strategies for renewal [C]. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1990. 166-187.
  • 6Berquist W H, Phillips S R. A Handbook for Faculty Development (Vol. 2) [M]. Washington, D. C.: Council for the Advancement of Small Colleges, 1977.326.
  • 7Boyer E. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professorate [ M ]. Jossey-Bass, 1997.16.
  • 8National Education Association. Faculty Dewlopmcnt in Higher Education : Enhancing a National Resource [ M ]. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1991.11-12.
  • 9Pat Hutchings, et al. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. An Annotated Bibliography [J]. Political Science and Politics, 2002, (2).
  • 10Astin, A. W. Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education [J]. Journal of College Student Development, 1999, (5).

共引文献1809

同被引文献18

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部