摘要
刑事证据规则的规范目的对于规则适用中的解释、裁量和漏洞填补来说非常重要,因此在证据规则的适用中应探寻其规范目的。在证据规则的规范目的探寻中,应尊重立法者所确定的规范目的,但在立法者目的不符合现实需求或者明显不合理时,司法者可以进行一定的修正。应深入发掘证据规则的实质目的,对于具有多元规范目的的证据规则,应合理选择其首要目的或优先目的。总体上看,我国刑事证据规则的规范目的可分为五种类型,即维护司法正义、保障公民权利;保障证据的客观真实性;对证明力评价进行规范、指引;保障当事人质证、询问等程序性权利;合理设置证明负担。
The objective of evidence rules is important to the interpretation, discretion and loophole filling up in the process of application, and therefore obje'etive should he explored first. In the exploration, the objective lawmakers set up should be respected, anal only when the objective lag behind reality or are manifestly unreasonable, can judicature revise it. The substantial objective should be searched. To those rules with muhi-objectives, the primary objective should be reasonably chosen. The objective of China' s evidence rules can be classified into five types, which are for keeping judicial justice and protecting citizen's right, which are for the authenticity of evidences, which restrict and direct the probative force evaluation, which are for protecting people' s procedure fights such as right of confrontation, which are to set up burden of proof reasonably.
作者
纵博
ZONG Bo(Law School of Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu Anhui 233000,Chin)
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期53-60,共8页
Legal Forum
关键词
刑事证据规则
规范目的
立法者目的
实质目的
criminal evidence rules
objective
legislatie purpose
substantial objective