摘要
判定起诉人是否具有城市规划利害关系人的身份是我国司法实践中所面临的难题,尤其是在起诉人并非城市规划相对人的情形下。在判定城市规划利害关系人时,首先应确定"权益"的有无,然后应判断"权益"与城市规划行为之间是否存在相当因果关系。在法律规则不明确的情形下,法院对"权益"和"因果关系"存在与否的判断,有赖于利益衡量方法的运用。
To judge whether the plaintiffs have the identities of urban planning stakeholders is a difficult problem our country" s judicial practice faces, especially the plaintiffs are not urban planning administrative subjects in this situation. When judging the urban planning stakeholders ,at first should identify the "rights and interests " whether exist or not , and then judge if there is a considerable causal relationship between the" rights and interests" and the urban planning act. In the case of the legal rules are not definite , the justices judge whether "rights and interests " and " causal relationships " presence or not depend on applying methods of interests balancing.
作者
季晨溦
JI Chenwei(Law School, Nanjing University, Nanjing Jiangsu 210093, China)
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期70-79,共10页
Legal Forum
基金
2016年度江苏省普通高校学术学位研究生科研创新计划省助项目"城乡规划利害关系人权利保护研究"(KYZZ160005)的阶段性成果
关键词
城市规划
利害关系人
权益要素
因果关系
urban planning
stakeholders
rights and interests factor
causal relationships