我国应诉管辖制度的反思与重构

Reflection and Reconstruction of The Respondent Jurisdication

应诉管辖制度在我国民诉法和司法解释中规定较为具体,但从制度配套的角度来讲,与"伪立案登记制"和移送管辖制度在法理和逻辑上存在较大冲突。这会引发限制应诉管辖适用及诱使地方保护主义等问题,冲击正常诉讼秩序。解决之道是废除"伪立案登记制度",并改"职权移送管辖"为"当事人申请管辖"。对于"法院告知义务"这一适用要件,保持不增设之立场。保留现有应诉管辖规定位置,同时针对应诉管辖具体适用过程中的问题--予以明确。这种重构保证应诉管辖在我国民事诉讼中的良好运行。

The respondent jurisdication has already setted in the civil litigation law in it＇s 2012 year＇s modification. Then, this institution may not function well in the circumstance of the present civil procedural law, because the adjacent instuation which includes the filling system and the jurisdication transfering system , have essential confliction with the respondent jurisdication. The confliction leads to many maligent consequence, therefore, some necessary reformity of the respondent jurisdication must be taken. These include amendment of the existing registration system, correcting transfer jurisdiction according to authority to application, without adding requirements of telling obligation,retaining the position of respondent Jurisdication, making clear specific application problems.