摘要
就戴海滨《"嘉定之变"与上海小刀会起义诸问题考论》提出商榷,文章认为该文有关周立春是否经刘丽川动员加入天地会、周立春与罗汉党的关系、周立春与地方政府的关系的论析,所依据的史料和推论基本不能支持作者的观点。同时,就戴文质疑是否存在"统一的上海小刀会"问题提出新观点:上海小刀会起义,是以天地会各支派为主干力量,以小刀会为共同名号,在互相支持配合协议基础上,由刘丽川、周立春分别领导城市游民和乡村农民在上海地区发动的武装起义。
The paper tends to have a deliberation with Prof. Dai Haibin, the author of "‘ Occupation of Jiading’ and the Small Swords Society Uprising in Shanghai". The paper holds that the relevant historical facts provided in Dai Haiping's paper are not sufficient to prove his opinions that Zhou Lichun was encouraged by Liu Lichuan to join Heaven and Earth Society, and the relationship between Zhou Lichun and Luohan Party, and the relationship between Zhou Lichun and the local government were only inferences. The paper also answers Dai‘s question of the existence of a unified Small Sword Society. The Small Sword Society Uprising in Shanghai was launched by urban vagrants and rural peasants, and most of them were the members of deferent branches of Heaven and Earth Society. The leaders were Liu Lichuan and Zhou Licun respectively.
出处
《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期145-152,共8页
Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
基金
上海市"高峰高原"学科建设项目资助
关键词
上海小刀会
周立春
刘丽川
天地会
the Small Sword Society in Shanghai, Zhou Licun, Liu Lichuan, Heaven and Earth Society