主客体互倚性的成对模式及其检验被引量：28

Dyadic Patterns in the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model and its Testing

下载PDF

导出

摘要主客体互倚性模型(APIM)以成对数据作为分析单元,是成对数据分析的重要方法。基于APIM中的主体效应与客体效应,Kenny等人论述了APIM的四种成对模式:主体模式、客体模式、对偶模式与对比模式。通过定义客体效应与主体效应的比值为k,Kenny等人提出了定量指标,以分析主客体互倚性的成对模式。成对模式分析有助于简化数据结果、检验理论模型、解析群体互动过程。虽然k值的检验程序较为复杂,但APIM成对模式及k值的提出,对于成对数据分析,特别是家庭研究与组织心理学研究具有重要意义。 APIM is an important analytic approach of dyadic data, and its analysis unit is dyad. Based on the actor and partner effects, Kenny and Ledermann discussed four general APIM dyadic patterns： the actor-only, the partner-only, the couple, and the contrast patterns. Then Kenny and Ledermann defined k as the ratio of the partner effect to the actor effect. By estimating k, researchers have a quantitative index of the relative size of the partner effect. Researchers can simplify the results and analyze the process of group interaction through dyadic patterns. On the basis of example, both advantage and limitation were discussed.

作者刘畅伍新春 LIU Chang WU Xinchun(Preschool Academy, Beijing Institute of Education, Beijing 100120 School of Psychology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875)

机构地区北京教育学院学前教育学院北京师范大学心理学院应用实验心理北京市重点实验室

出处《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期105-112,共8页 Psychological Development and Education

基金北京市教育科学"十二五"规划2015年度课题"父亲与母亲教养投入对青少年心理适应影响的比较研究"(AFA15199)

关键词主客体互倚性模型主体模式客体模式对偶模式对比模式 Actor-Partner Interdependence Model actor-only pattern partner-only pattern couple pattern contrast pattern

分类号 B844 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1陈玲玲,伍新春,刘畅.父母的婚姻满意度对父亲教养投入的影响:父母协同教养的中介作用[J].心理发展与教育,2014,30(3):268-276. 被引量：28
2李育辉,黄飞.成对数据分析之行动者-对象互依性模型(APIM)[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(8):1321-1328. 被引量：18

二级参考文献78

1Alferes, V. R., & Kenny, D. A. (2009). SPSS programs for the measurement of nonindependence in standard dyadic designs. Behavioral Research Methods, 41, 47-54.
2Brauer, M., & Judd, C. M. (2000). Defining variables in relationship to other variables: When interactions suddenly turn out to be main effect. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 36, 410--423.
3Bulter, E. A., Lee, T. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific. Emotion, 7, 30-48.
4Burkholder, G. J., & Harlow, L. L. (2003). An illustration of a longitudinal cross-lagged design for larger structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10,465-486.
5Cillessen, A. H. N., Jiang, X. L., West, T. V., & Laszkowski, D. K. (2005). Predictors of dyadic friendship quality in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 165-172.
6Campbell, L., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user friendly guide. Personal Relationship, 9, 327-342.
7Campbell, L., Simpson, J. A., Boldry, J., & Kashy, D. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510-531.
8Cook, W. L. (1998). Integrating models of interdependence with treatment evaluations in marital therapy research. Journal of Family Psychology, 12, 529-542.
9Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101-109.
10Crocker, J., & Canevello, A. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 555-575.