期刊文献+

甲颏高度预测患者困难气道的准确性 被引量:4

Accuracy of thyromental height in predicting difficult airway
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价甲颏高度预测患者困难气道的准确性。方法选择气管插管全身麻醉择期手术患者330例,性别不限,年龄〉18岁,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级。入室后测定改良Mallampati评分(MMT)、甲颏间距、胸颏间距和甲颏高度。麻醉诱导后常规喉镜下显露声门,进行Cormack—Lehane分级。以Cormack—Lehane分级Ⅲ级或Ⅳ级定义为困难气道。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价MMT、甲颏间距、胸颏间距和甲颏高度预测困难气道的准确性。结果甲颏高度预测困难气道的诊断阈值为39.04mm,灵敏度88.24%,特异度90.42%,曲线下面积(95%可信区间)0.897(0.859-0.928),比值比70.750。与MMT、甲颏间距和胸颏间距比较,甲颏高度预测患者困难气道的曲线下面积增大(P〈O.05)。结论甲颏高度可准确预测患者困难气道,诊断阈值为39.04mm。 Objective To evaluate the accuracy of thyromental height (TMH) in predicting diffi- cult airway. Methods Three hundred and thirty patients of both sexes requiring endotracheal intubation, aged 〉 18 yr, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ , scheduled for elective sur- gery under general anesthesia, were selected. The modified Mallampati test (MMT) score, thyromental distance (THD) , sternomental distance (SMD) and TMH were measured following admission to the oper- ating room. Direct laryngoscope was placed after induction of anesthesia to expose the glottis, and the Cor- mack-Lehane grade was recorded. Difficult airway was defined as Cormack-Lehane grade m or IV. The re- ceiver-operating characteristics curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of MMT, THD, SMD and TMH in predicting difficult airway. Results The diagnostic threshold of TMH in predicting difficult airway was 39.04 mm, the sensitivity 88.24%, the specificity 90.42%, the area under the curve (95% confidence interval) 0.897 (0.859-0.928), and the odds ratio 70.750. Compared with MMT, THD and SMD, the area under the curve of TMH in predicting difficult airway was significantly increased (P〈0.05). Conclu- sion TMH can accurately predict difficult airway, and the diagnostic threshold is 39.04 mm in patients.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期1254-1256,共3页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
基金 贵州省卫生计生委科学技术基金项目(gzwjkj2014-1-036)
关键词 甲状软骨 插管法 气管内 Thyroid cartilage Chin Intubation,intratracheal
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1曹铭辉,梁建军,吴强.两种预测困难气管插管方法的临床价值评估[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2004,9(2):108-109. 被引量:7
  • 2单热爱,陈新荣,孙来保,彭道珍,叶军明,刘金龙.上唇咬合试验用于颈椎手术患者困难气管插管预测的研究[J].广东医学,2007,28(4):578-579. 被引量:7
  • 3金丕焕.医学统计方法.第2版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2003:211-217.
  • 4Koh LK, Kong CE, Ip-Yam Pc. The modified cormack-le?hane scores for the grading of direct laryngoscope: evaluation in the Asian population. Anesth Intensive Care, 2002, 30 (1): 48-51.
  • 5Knill RL. Difficult laryngoscope made easy with a "BURP". CanJ Anaesth, 1993, 40(2): 279-282.
  • 6黄悦勤,主编.临床流行病学.第2版.北京:人民卫生出版,2008:144-157.
  • 7Lundstrom LH, Vester-Andersen M, Moller AM, et al. Poor prognostic value of the modified Mallampati score: a meta-analysis involving 177088 patients. BrJ Anaesth , 2011,107(5): 659-667.
  • 8EI-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, et al. Preopera?tive airway assessment: Predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg , 1996, 82(6): 1197-1204.
  • 9Bilgin H, Ozyurt G. Screening tests for predicting difficult intubation. A clinical assessment in Turkish patients. An?aesth Intensive Care, 1998,26(4): 382-386.
  • 10Crosby ET, CooPer RM, Douglas MJ, et al. The unantici?pated difficult airway with recommendations for management. CanJ Anaesth, 1998,45(8): 757-756.

共引文献247

同被引文献14

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部