摘要
目的:比较常规三联与四联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌(Hp)阳性消化道溃疡的疗效和安全性。方法:96例Hp阳性消化道溃疡患者随机分为对照组(48例)和观察组(48例)。观察组患者给予雷贝拉唑肠溶片10 mg/次,2次/d+阿莫西林胶囊1.0 g/次,2次/d+克拉霉素胶囊0.5 g/次,2次/d+枸橼酸铋钾颗粒220 mg/d,2次/d。对照组患者给予雷贝拉唑肠溶片10 mg/次,2次/d+阿莫西林胶囊1.0 g/次,2次/d+克拉霉素胶囊0.5 g/次,2次/d。两组疗程均为14 d。比较两组患者Hp根除情况,临床症状改善情况,溃疡愈合情况和不良反应发生情况。结果:观察组患者Hp根除率、临床症状改善率、溃疡愈合率显著高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:常规四联疗法在提高Hp根除率,改善患者临床症状和溃疡愈合情况方面优于常规三联疗法,两者安全性相当。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of conventional triple/quadruple therapy for patients with Hp posi- tive in the digestive tract ulcer. METHODS: 96 patients with Hp infection in the digestive tract ulcer were randomly divided into control group (48 cases) and observation group (48 cases). Observation group received Rabeprazole enteric-coated tablet 10 mg/ times, twice/d + Amoxicillin capsule 1.0 g/times, twice/d+Clarithromycin capsule 0.5 g/times, twice/d +Bismuth potassium citrate capsule 220 mg/d, twice/d. Control group received Rabeprazole enteric-coated tablet 10 mg/times, twice/d + Amoxicillin capsule 1.0 g/times, twice/d + Clarithromycin capsule 0.5 g/times, twice/d. They treated for 14 d. Hp eradication, improvement of clinical symptoms, ulcer healing and the incidence of adverse reactions in 2 groups were compared. RESULTS : The Hp eradication rate, to- tal effective rate of the improvement of clinical symptoms and total effective rate of ulcer healing in observation group were signifi- cantly higher than control group, with statistical significance (P〈0.05). And there was no significant difference in the total inci- dence of adverse reactions in 2 groups (P〉0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of conventional quadruple therapy is superior to conventional triple therapy in the treatment of Hp infection in the digestive tract ulcer, which can improve Hp eradication rate, clin- ical symptoms and ulcer healing, with similar safety.
出处
《中国药房》
CAS
北大核心
2017年第3期321-323,共3页
China Pharmacy
关键词
幽门螺杆菌
四联疗法
三联疗法
疗效
安全性
Helicobacter pylori
Quadruple therapy
Triple therapy
Efficacy
Safety