期刊文献+

信息完整性缓解权力差距对建议表面采纳的影响 被引量:3

Information Completeness Alleviate the Effect of Power Gap on Nominal Advice-taking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的本研究根据内隐态度是否改变,将建议采纳(Advice Taking)区分为表面采纳和真实采纳,从权力差距入手探讨其对表面采纳的影响,并考查信息完整性如何降低表面采纳提高真实采纳。方法实验以在校大学生为被试(N=170),将权力差距设为被试内变量,信息完整性为组间变量,随机将被试分为高信息完整性组和低信息完整性组,通过五个决策情境来探讨两个变量对表面采纳的影响。结果分析发现,决策者权力小于建议者时,决策者的建议采纳程度较高,但存在表面采纳现象;决策者与建议者权力接近时,建议采纳程度较低,表面采纳也较低;当信息完整性提高时,表面采纳程度显著降低,真实采纳提高。结论权力差距增大会导致表面采纳;提高信息完整性可降低表面采纳。 Objective Based on the implicit attitude perspective,the study distinguished between nominal advice - taking and real advice - taking, and then explored how the gap of advisor and judge power, as well as the informa- tion completeness,would influence nominal advice - taking. Methods An experiment (N = 170) was conducted and the participants from the same university were randomly divided into two groups with different degrees of informa- tion completeness. The participants were asked to finish a task which included five decision - making questions and then, taking example of IAT, participants were asked to finish a task of categorizing words. Results After data analy- sis, the study found that when the power of judge was lower than that of advisor, judge was more likely to accept the advice, but there was nominal advice -taking existing. When the power of judge was similar to advisor~ power,judge would underweight the advice,but the degree of nominal advice -taking was lower, too. At the same time, when the information completeness rate was higher,judge was more likely to really accept advice. Conclusion The bigger the gap of power is, the more the nominal advice - taking is, and increasing information completeness would reduce nomi- nal advice -taking and increase real advice -taking.
出处 《人类工效学》 2016年第6期34-39,共6页 Chinese Journal of Ergonomics
基金 国家自然科学基金(71372180)
关键词 权力差距 信息完整性 建议采纳 表面采纳 支持理论 建议折扣效应 内隐联想测验 the gap of power information completeness advice taking nominal advice - taking support theory advice discounting effect implicit association test
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献59

  • 1张德胜,金耀基,陈海文,陈健民,杨中芳,赵志裕,伊莎白.论中庸理性:工具理性、价值理性和沟通理性之外[J].社会学研究,2001(2):33-48. 被引量:196
  • 2翟学伟.人情、面子与权力的再生产——情理社会中的社会交换方式[J].社会学研究,2004(5):48-57. 被引量:511
  • 3段锦云,钟建安.组织中的进谏行为[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):69-71. 被引量:99
  • 4郭冠清.文化因素对企业经营绩效影响的研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(10):91-97. 被引量:24
  • 5陈之昭.面子心理的理论分析与实际研究,收录于中国社会心理学评论(第二辑),翟学伟.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006.
  • 6李敏龙,杨国枢.(2008).忍的心理与行为.见杨国枢,黄光国,杨中芳(编),华人本土心理学(下)(pp.579-608).重庆:重庆大学出版社.
  • 7黄光国.(2006).人情与面子:中国人的权力游戏.见杨国枢(编),中国人的心理(PP.226-248).南京:江苏教育出版社.
  • 8黄光国.(2008).华人社会中的脸面观.见杨国枢,黄光国,杨中芳(编),华人本土心理学(pp.355-394).重庆:重庆大学出版社.
  • 9黄丽莉.(2008).人际和谐与人际冲突.见杨国枢,黄光国,杨中芳(编),华华人本土心理学(PP.505-548).重庆:重庆大学出版社.
  • 10Botero, I. C., & van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 84-104.

共引文献85

同被引文献8

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部