摘要
选取中国、美国、巴西的6年级较主流数学教材,比较教材中"比和比例"的相关章节.3个国家教材的问题定位、认知需求问题的分布和结构均较为相似,组织方式均为螺旋式非线性,很少涉及信息技术运用和数学史情境.对于"比和比例"的内容应从学生数学学习持续发展的角度给予关注.对于教材编写中问题情境的设计,可以适度增加不同主题间数学情境问题所占比重,对于开放式、半开放式问题的设计与相应学段学生心理发展水平和已有知识经验基础相匹配,寻求非数学情境问题类型的多样化.3个国家的数学教材基于熟悉情境的问题比例较高,基于陌生情境的反思式问题占比偏低.
We selected the mainstream Grade 6 mathematics textbooks from three countries: Brazil, China and the United States, and compared the relevant chapters of ratio and proportion. It is found that the locations of problem, distributions and structures of cognition problems are much the same. The organizations are spiral and nonlinear. The information technology and history of mathematics situation are rarely involved. But the significant differences are as follows: the kinds of problems situations, the disposal ways of mathematics concepts and teaching methods. It puts forward proposals about writing of textbooks on contents processing, problem situations and need levels for cognition designing.
出处
《数学教育学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期46-50,共5页
Journal of Mathematics Education
基金
教育部人文社科规划基金项目——数学阅读能力:结构与发展研究(16YJA880056)
广东省“十二五”教育科学规划项目——教师教学行为与教学价值取向适切性研究(2013JK169)
惠州学院博士科研启动项目——新课程数学解题教学实践反思研究(C513.0208)
关键词
问题情境
教材编写
比和比例
比较研究
problem situation
writing of textbooks
ratio and proportion
comparative studies