期刊文献+

市场结构和补贴对公交成本效率与服务效果的影响研究 被引量:1

The Impact of Market Structure and Subsidies on Cost Efficiency and Service Effectiveness of Public Transport
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公交市场结构和补贴是交通行业改革发展中关注的重要问题.采用随机前沿分析方法,利用1990—2013年我国33个大中城市公共交通的运营数据,研究了市场结构和补贴对城市公交成本效率和服务效果的影响.研究表明:公交补贴对成本效率和服务效果均有正向激励作用,且补贴对公交服务效果的影响更为显著,补贴占成本比率与成本效率和服务效果呈现倒"U"型关系,其比率在5%-10%区间时达到最高,说明适当的补贴对提高公交运营效率有正面效果;国有主导下的公交市场结构会降低成本效率,提升服务效果,且其成本效率和服务效果均高于市场化主导模式. Market structure and public transport subsidies are the important issues in public transport industry. It is studied in this paper that the impact of market structure and subsidies on the cost efficiency and service efficiency of public transport using stochastic frontier analysis method and annual data of 33 cities in China from 1990 to 2013. The research shows that the effect of public transport subsidies on cost efficiency and service efficiency are all positive, and the effect of subsidies on public transport is more significant. It presents an inverted "U" type relationship between subsidy ratio and cost efficiency and also service effect,and reach to the highest when its ratio in the 5%~10% range, which shows that the appropriate subsidies to improve the efficiency of public transport has a positive effect. Public transport market structure under the guidance of state- owned has a negative effect on cost efficiency and positive on service effectiveness of public transport. But the cost efficiency and service efficiency of state- owned transit firm are higher than private firm.
出处 《交通运输系统工程与信息》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期40-46,53,共8页 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology
关键词 交通运输经济 市场结构和补贴 随机前沿分析 公共交通 成本效率 服务效果 transportation economy market structure and financial subsidies stochastic frontier analysis public transport cost efficiency service effectiveness
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献29

  • 1朱微微,赵定涛.中国城市公共交通行业技术效率实证研究[J].运筹与管理,2007,16(2):154-158. 被引量:2
  • 2MAGNUS S. A Broad Performance Benchmark Based on Citizens Preferences [J]. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 2009, 80(4): 579-603.
  • 3WILLIAM R, ANNE Y B. Ownership, Contractual Practices and Technical Efficiency: The Case of Urban Public Transport in France [J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 2007, 41(2): 257-282.
  • 4OTTOZ E F G, DI G M .The Impact of Ownership on the Cost of Bus Service Provision:An Example from Italy[J]. Applied Economice, 2009, 41(3): 337-349.
  • 5ANDREA B, MARCELLA N, CARLO S. Do Competition and Ownership Matter? Evidence from Local Public Transport in Europe [EB/OL]. (2010-1 -20) [2011 -2-27] http://istituti. unicatt.it/teoria._economica_metodi_quantitativi_ 160210.pdf.
  • 6VICENTE P, LOURDES T. Analysis of the Efficiency of Local Government Services Delivery: An Application to Urban Public Transport[J]. Transportation Research Part A, 2001, 35(10): 929-944.
  • 7SUZANNE L, OLGA S. Reassessing Privatization Strategies 25 Years Later: Revisiting PenT and Babitsky Comparative Performance Study of Urban Bus Transit Service[J]. Public Administration Review, 2009, 69(5 ) : 855-867.
  • 8.l F M K, BERT E. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Infrastructures: Reconciling Private Sector Participation and Sustainability[J]. Public Administration Review, 2009, 69 (2) : 284-296.
  • 9VAND De Velde D M . Organizational Forms and Entre- preneurship in Public Transport [J]. Transport Policy, 1999, 6(3): 147-157.
  • 10MIGUEL A. Public vs Private Management of Public Utilities The Case of Urban Public Transport in Europe [J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2008, 22( 1 ) : 85-90.

共引文献20

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部