期刊文献+

德国COMET评分量表在我国应用的多面Rasch模型分析 被引量:4

Analysis of Application of German COMET Score Scale in China Context with the Many-Faceted Rasch Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 德国COMET评分量表是职业能力测评的重要评价工具,其蕴含着设计导向的职业教育思想和综合职业能力的人才培养目标,对我国职业教育评价及改革都具有重要借鉴意义。运用项目反应理论之多面Rasch模型,对COMET评分量表在我国学生职业能力测评中的适用性进行了分析。结果表明:COMET评分量表总体区分度较高,能够有效地区分我国职业教育背景下的学生职业能力水平;我国学生对COMET评分量表部分项目存在着不适应现象,部分学生答题行为内部一致性较差;我国教师对COMET评分量表宽严尺度把握内部一致性较好,但不同评分教师个体之间的宽严程度还存在差异;评分教师与评分项目交互作用也存在一些显著偏差。 German COMET score scale based the guideline of design orientation and comprehensive professional competence is an important evaluation tool for professional competence evaluation, and it is of great significance to the evaluation and reform of Vocational Education in our country. The applicability of German COMET score scale was analyzed in the context of Chinese students' professional competence evaluation with the Many-Facet Rasch Model. The results showed that the COMET score scale had higher differential validity, and could differentiate Chinese students' professional competence; there was the question of adaption of some items on Chinese students; some students' answers had poor internal consistency; Chinese teachers had good internal consistency on the COMET score scale, but there was significant difference between teacher individual, and some biases also existed in the interaction between teachers and items.
出处 《职业技术教育》 北大核心 2016年第25期69-74,共6页 Vocational and Technical Education
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关课题"中国现代职业教育质量保障体系研究"(13JZD047) 主持人:赵志群 全国教育科学"十二五"规划2014年度教育部课题"高职教师职业自我效能感及发展策略的实证研究"(EJA140375) 主持人:何兴国
关键词 COMET评分量表 多面RASCH模型 项目分析 职业能力测评 职业院校 COMET score scale Many-Faceted Rasch Model item analysis professional competence evaluation vocational colleges
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献67

  • 1魏登云.主观评分误差的非参数处理方法[J].中国体育科技,2001,37(3):38-40. 被引量:21
  • 2罗冠中.Rasch模型及其发展[J].教育研究与实验,1992(2):40-43. 被引量:5
  • 3王华.《二语口语测试》评介[J].现代外语,2005,28(2):210-213. 被引量:13
  • 4魏高峡,李佑发,孙晓敏.概化理论及其在运动成绩主观评定中的应用[J].北京体育大学学报,2006,29(1):53-55. 被引量:3
  • 5Keats J A.Rasch的测验理论[J].心理学报,1990,3:267-271.
  • 6Al-Owidha, A. A. (2007). A comparison of the Rasch model and the three-parameter logistic model applied to the quantitative subtest of the General Aptitude Test, Saudi Arabia (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Denver, Colorado, USA.
  • 7Andrich, D. (2004). Controversy and the Rasch model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Medical Care, 42, 1-16.
  • 8Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
  • 9Bowles, R. P., & Ram, N. (2006). Using Rasch measurement to investigate volleyball skills and inform coaching. Journal of Applied Measurement, 7(1), 39-54.
  • 10Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, W. C., & Ho, Y. H. (2009). Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 369-388.

共引文献144

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部