期刊文献+

再论雷考夫范畴化理论的缺陷 被引量:4

Inadequacies of Lakoff's Categorization Theory: Some New Reflections
原文传递
导出
摘要 雷考夫的范畴化理论是认知语言学的重要理论之一,该理论在广泛应用于语言研究的同时,其缺陷也日益引起学界的重视。以往对该理论缺陷的研究多集中在对范畴本质的质疑和在语言研究中其解释力的充分性上,对理论本体的宏观反思较少。本文从雷考夫范畴化理论的本体出发,探讨该理论在宏观层面的不足之处,认为这一理论的缺陷主要包括4个方面:(1)研究视角:缺乏共时与历时的结合;(2)研究语料:缺乏跨语言的多样性;(3)理论基础:忽视范畴原型的相对性;(4)理论核心:内部结构不一致。 Lakoff’s Categorization Theory is one of the important theories in cognitive linguistics. Although the theory has a wide application in language study,its inadequacies gradually draw researchers’ attention. Previous studies on the topic mainly question the essence of categories and the explanatory power of the theory in language study. This paper focuses on a comprehensive reflection of the theory itself. It finds out that the inadequacies of Lakoff’s Categorization Theory include four aspects,namely( 1) the theory does not study categorization with a combination of synchronic and diachronic perspectives;( 2) the theory is not verified by sufficient cross-language data;( 3) the relativity of prototype is overlooked;( 4) the internal structures of ICM are inconsistent.
作者 杨梅
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期44-48,共5页 Foreign Language Research
基金 教育部人文社科基金项目"英译汉翻译语言语义韵特征研究:历时的视角"(13YJC740121)的阶段性成果
关键词 范畴化 雷考夫 缺陷 categorization Lakoff inadequacies
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献44

  • 1石毓智.《女人,火,危险事物——范畴揭示了思维的什么奥秘》评介[J].当代语言学,1995(2):17-22. 被引量:50
  • 2Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things[M]. Chicago: the University of Chicago Press.
  • 3Minsky, M. 1975. A framework for representing knowledge [A]. In P. H. Winston (ed.). The Psychology of Computer Version[C].New York: McGraw-Hill, 211-79.
  • 4Ogden, C. A. & I. A. Richards. 1923. The Meaning of Meaning: A Study on the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism[M]. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • 5Panther, Klaus- Uwe & Linda Thornburg. 1998. A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation [J]. Journal of Pragmatics,30:755-769.
  • 6Panther, Klaus- Uwe & Linda Thornburg. 1999. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian [A]. In Klaus - Uwe Panther & Günter Radden (eds.). Metonymy in Thought and Language[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 333-57.
  • 7Panther, Klaus- Uwe & Linda Thornburg. 2000. The EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonmy in English grammar [A]. In Antonio Barcelona (ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads[C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 215-231.
  • 8Radden, Günter. 2000. How metonymic are metaphors [A]. In Antonio Barcelona (ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads [C]. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 93-108.
  • 9Radden, Günter & Zoltán Kovecses. 1999. Towards a Theory of Metonymy [A]. In Klaus - Uwe Panther & Günter Radden (eds.).Metonymy in Thought and Language[C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 17-59.
  • 10Rumelhart, D. 1975. Notes on a schema for stories [A]. In D. G. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (eds.). Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science[C]. New York: Academic Press, 211-36.

共引文献28

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部