摘要
德国法教义学的基本构造是一个基于"否定禁令"的前提以及一套以此为基础的推理和检验体系。潘德克顿学派建构的"科学面向的法教义学"通过"否定禁令"和"概念体系"的结构为获得法律的普遍和确定的"真理"提供了可能性,但是这种以罗马法为基础建立起来的法律形式主义体系不能满足生活、社会发展及变化的现实;"经验、实践面向的法教义学"通过目的、价值和利益为基础建构的"行为体系"能够适应现实需求,但是将法律的普遍和确定性陷入相对性的困境中;通过揭示"演绎—体系"和"归纳—实用"的"诠释学循环"结构,我们可以实现两种法教义学的沟通与合作。
The basic compositions of legal dogmatics are the "negation ban" and the reasoning and examining system based on "negation ban". The legal formal system, which was built by the school of Pandecten on the basis Roman law, is no longer able to satisfy the de- mands of the constantly changing social reality. In contrast, practical legal dogmatics, which can satisfy the needs of ever-changing society, has put the universal and doubtless "truth" in trouble. We can find a mechanism of communication between the two legal dogmatics by revea- ling the structure of hermeneutic circle between "deduction-system" and "induction-pragmatics".
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期149-167,共19页
Global Law Review
基金
2015年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“解释作为法律的结构及其对法治的影响”(15YJC820004)
2014年南京师范大学法制现代化研究中心项目(FZXDH2014001)的研究成果