期刊文献+

美国国家豁免法中“恐怖主义例外”的立法及司法实践评析 被引量:9

The “Terrorism Exception” in the US Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: Legislation and Judicial Practice
原文传递
导出
摘要 美国在其《外国主权豁免法》中创设了一项新的国家豁免——"恐怖主义例外",允许恐怖主义受害者及其家属在美国联邦法院直接起诉"恐怖主义资助国"以获得民事赔偿。在国内法层面,该项国家豁免例外为恐怖主义受害者及其家属提供了追究"恐怖主义资助国"责任的法律途径;在国际法层面,其作为一国的反恐单边措施,势必影响其他国家的国家行为和责任承担,且可能因当前打击国际恐怖主义的需求而被更多的国家认可和效法,值得加以关注。 The "terrorism exception" recently established in the Foreign Sovereign Im- munities Act indicates a significant move taken by the U. S. against the jurisdictional immunities of states. The exception allows individuals to sue "terrorism-sponsoring states" for the damages they suffered from terrorism. It is a unilateral measure that affects actions and obligations of oth- er states, and could be widely accepted as a necessary measure against terrorism. This article explains the historical background and legislative purposes of the "terrorism-exception", analy- zes its pros and cons in practice as well as its enforceability under international law, and addres- ses its implications for the corresponding rule-making in China.
作者 王蕾凡
出处 《环球法律评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期168-178,共11页 Global Law Review
基金 中国人民大学2016年拔尖创新人才培育资助计划的研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1David M.Ackerman.CRS Report for Congress Suits against Terrorist States[]..2002
  • 2Sean D Murphy.U.S.Judgments against Terrorist States[].American Journal of International Law.2001
  • 3Sean D Murphy.U.S.Judgments against Terrorist States[].American Journal of International Law.2001
  • 4Mona Conway.Terrorism,the Law and Politics as Usual:A Comparison of Anti-terrorism Legislation before and after 9/11[].Touro LRev.2002
  • 5Molora Vadnais.The Terrorism Exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act:Forward Leaning Legislation or Just Bad Law?[].UCLA JInt‘l L& ForAff.
  • 6Mona Conway.Terrorism,the Law and Politics as Usual:A Comparison of Anti-terrorism Legislation before and after 9/11[].Touro L Rev.2002
  • 7David M.Ackerman.CRS Report for Congress Suits against Terrorist States[]..2002
  • 8David MacKusick.Human Rights vs.Sovereign Rights:the State Sponsored Terrorism Exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act[].(Emory University School of LawEmory International Law Review).
  • 9http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Word/116. doc . 2005
  • 10.Argentine Republic v.Amerada Hess Shipping Corp[].US.1989

共引文献10

引证文献9

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部