期刊文献+

造瘘袋及伤口保护罩护理在重症急性胰腺炎患者中的应用效果 被引量:1

Nursing care of ostomy bag and incision shield for the patients with severe acute pancreatitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨造瘘袋及伤口保护罩护理在重症急性胰腺炎患者中的应用效果。方法选取2013年1月至2015年12月在本院治疗的98例重症急性胰腺炎患者,将其随机分为对照组和观察组。其中对照组给予上腹联合侧腹壁切口术后常规护理,观察组患者则在对照组基础上给予包括造瘘袋及伤口保护罩护理的综合护理措施。观察比较两组患者的感染消退时间、二次手术发生率、住院时间、住院期间病死率、日平均换药次数、日平均更换床单次数及伤口缩小30%时间;并对两组患者对护理人员的满意度进行调查。结果(1)观察组患者皮炎发生率为58.0%,显著小于对照组(87.5%);观察组患者感染消退时间、二次手术发生率、住院周期及住院期间病死率分别为(14.5±6.0)d、8.0%、(47.1±8.5)d、6.0%,均显著低于对照组[分别为(30.5±15.8)d、27.1%、(62.0±8.9)d、20.8%],均P〈0.05。(2)观察组患者日平均换药次数、日平均更换床单次数及伤口缩小30%时间分别为(2.1±0.9)次、(1.2±0.5)次、(21.5±5.5)d,均显著低于对照组[分别为(8.5±3.8)次、(5.5±1.5)次、(35.5±8.5)d],且观察组护理满意度评分为(95.5±5.5)分,显著高于对照组[(88.0±6.1)分],以上差异均具有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。结论重症急性胰腺炎上腹联合侧腹壁切口术后患者给予包括造瘘袋及伤口保护罩护理的综合护理措施可显著缩短患者感染消退时间和住院周期,降低二次手术发生率和住院期间病死率,且可显著降低患者护理成本,提高患者对护理人员满意度,值得进一步在临床护理中应用。 Objective To study the effect of nursing care of ostomy bag and incision shield for the patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Methods 98 patients with severe acute pancreatitis treated at our hospital from January, 2013 to December, 2015 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group. The control group was conventionally cared; in addition, the observation group patients received comprehensive nursing care, including the nursing care of ostomy bag and incision shield. The infection- fading time, incidence of secondary surgery, hospital stay, mortality during hospitalization, average daily dressing change times, average daily sheet-replacing times, and time for the wound reducing 30% were compared between these two groups. The satisfaction degree was investigated in both groups. Results The incidence of dermatitis was 58.0% in the observation group and was 87.5% in the control group. The infection-fading time, incidence of secondary surgery, hospital stay, and mortality during hospitalization were ( 14.5±6.0 )d, 8.0%, ( 47.1 ±8.5 )d, and 6.0% in the observation group and were ( 30.5±15.8 ) d, 27.1%, ( 62.0±8.9 ) d, and 20.8% in the control group (P 〈 0.05 ) . The average daily dressing change times, average daily sheet-replacing times, and time for the wound reducing 30% were ( 2.1±0.9 )times, ( 1.2±0.5 )times, and (21.5±5.5)d in the observation group and were ( 8.5±3.8 ) times, ( 5.5±1.5 ) times, and (35.5±8.5)d in the control group. The satisfaction score was ( 95.5±5.5 ) in the control group and was ( 88.0±6.1 ) in the control group. Conclusions Comprehensive nursing care, including the nursing care of ostomy bag and incision shield, for patients with severe acute pancreatitis after lateral incision can significantly shorten the infection-fading time and hospital stay, reduce the incidence of secondary surgery and mortality during hospitalization, significantly reduce the cost of patient care, and improve the patients' satisfaction, so it deserves further application in clinical nursing care.
作者 赵丽静
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2017年第1期126-129,共4页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 造瘘袋 伤口保护罩 重症急性胰腺炎 效果 Ostomy bag Incision shield Severe acute pancreatitis Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献57

  • 1郑美春,朱亚萍,陈秀杰,辛明珠,冯伟嫦.应用造口袋收集腹部各种渗出液的体会[J].大肠肛门病外科杂志,2004,10(3):226-227. 被引量:29
  • 2阮瑞霞,乔丽娜,寇雅莉,刘小明,王改艳.11例肠外瘘患者的瘘口护理[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(11):986-987. 被引量:30
  • 3Schmid SW, Uhl W, Friess H, et al. The role of infection in acute pancreatitis[J]. Gut, 1999,45(2):311-6.
  • 4Connor S, Alexakis N, Raraty M G, et al. Early and late complications after pancreatic necrosectomy[J]. Surgery, 2005, 137(5): 499-50.
  • 5Connor S, Ghaneh P, Raraty M, et al. Minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy[J]. Dig Surg, 2003,20(4):270-7.
  • 6Horvath K, Freeny P, Escallon J, et al. Safety and efficacy of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement for infected pancreatic collections: a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase 2 study [J]. Arch Surg, 2010,145(9):817-25.
  • 7Lakshmanan R, Iyer SG, Lee VT, et al. Minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic neeroseetomy in the management of infected pancreatitis[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Yech, 2010,20(1):e11-5.
  • 8Gambiez L P, Denimal F A, Porte H L, et al. Retroperitoneal approach and endoscopic management of peripancreatic necrosis collections[J]. Arch Surg, 1998, 133(1): 66-72.
  • 9Van Santvoort H C, Besselink M G, Bollen T L, et al. Case-matched comparison of the retroperitoneal approach with laparotomy for necrotizing pancreatitis[J]. World J Sttrg, 2007, 31(8): 1635-42.
  • 10Pa moukian VN, Gagner M. Laparoscopic necrosectomy for acute necrotizing pancreatitis. J Hepatobiliary [J]. Pancreat Surg, 2001,8 (3):221-223.

共引文献68

同被引文献11

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部