摘要
目的比较改良经口内镜下肌切开术(Liu—POEM)与传统POEM在治疗贲门失弛缓症中的差异。方法采用回顾性研究方法,选择30例完成Liu-POEM的患者和应用Liu-POEM之前近期完成传统POEM的30例患者为研究对象,通过对比两种术式的总手术时间、术后并发症及症状评分(Eckardt评分)来评价Liu-POEM的安全性和有效性。结果Liu-POEM平均总手术时间为(27.13±11.42)min,平均肌切开时间为(13.20±5.09)min;术后无患者出现纵隔及皮下气肿,无发热。传统POEM平均总手术时间为(51.22±25.63)min,平均肌切开时间为(11.18±7.61)min;术后有3例(10%)患者出现皮下气肿,未经特殊治疗,术后2d自行吸收;1例患者术后发热1d,最高体温37.6℃,物理降温后体温恢复正常。所有患者术后Eckardt评分〈3分。术后随访3-12个月,均无远期并发症发生。结论Liu-POEM具有操作技术简单,手术时间短,手术创伤小的优点。
Objective To compare the difference between modified peroral endoscopic myotomy (Liu-POEM) and conventional POEM for achalasia. Methods Thirty aehalasia patients treated with Liu- POEM and 30 with conventional POEM were enrolled. A retrospective study was performed to compare the conventional POEM and Liu-POEM procedures by evaluating total operation time, postoperative complications and symptoms( Eckardt score). Results The average total operation time of Liu-POEM was 27. 13 ± 11.42 min and the average myotomy time was 13.20±5.09 min. There was no pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema or fever. The average total operation time of conventional POEM was 51.22 ± 25.63 min. The average myotomy time was 11.18±7.61 min. There were three cases ( 10% ) of subcutaneous emphysema but recovered after two days without any special treatment. One patient who underwent conventional POEM had fever( the highest temperature was 37. 6℃ )and his temperature subsided to normal after physical cooling in one day. Postoperative Eckardt scores of patients were all less than 3. After postoperative follow-up of 3 to 12 months, no complications occurred in any patient. Conclusion Liu-POEM is a modified approach to treat achalasia, advantageous over conventional POEM in more simplified operation procedure, shorter operation time and less invasiveness.
出处
《中华消化内镜杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第1期34-37,共4页
Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
关键词
食管失弛症
改良经口内镜下肌切开术
对比研究
Esophageal achalasia
Modified peroral endoscopic myotomy
Comparative study