期刊文献+

企业二元行为研究的范式之争及其超越:时间视角 被引量:8

Paradigm Dispute of Firm Ambidextrous Behavior Research and Its Transcendence:A Temporal Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 企业探索行为和利用行为中隐含着"时间"维度,本文的研究发现:(1)"时间"是二元性和间断平衡这两大企业二元行为研究范式的核心;(2)企业二元性理论和间断平衡理论间的核心分歧在于"时间假设"和"行为的时间模式"的差异性,并由此引发它们在其他相关议题上的不同看法;(3)更加全面的企业二元行为类型应该超越二元性范式和间断平衡范式,这可以由"二元行为序列"(sequence of ambidextrous behavior,SAB)这一研究议题来囊括,可以从单一行为的时间属性、二元行为的时间属性、恰当的理论阐释三个方面来推进相关研究。本文的研究拓宽了二元行为研究的理论视角,弥补了上述两大范式在"时间"维度上的不足,并力图探索二元行为研究的新思路和新方向。 Firm exploratory and exploitative behavior implies the temporal dimension. This paper comes to the conclusions as follows: firstly, "time" is at the core of the two paradigms of firm ambidextrous behavior, namely ambidexterity and punctuated equilibrium; secondly, the core dispute of these two paradigms lies in the differences of "temporal assumption"and "the temporal model of the behavior", thereby leading to their different views towards related topics; thirdly, more comprehensive types of firm ambidextrous behavior should transcend the paradigms of ambidexterity and punctuated equilibrium, which could be embraced by the research topic of "sequence of ambidextrous behavior", including the research of temporal attributes of single behavior, ambidextrous behavior and appropriate theoretical explanation. These findings broaden the theoretical perspectives of firm ambidextrous behavior research, make up the inadequacy of two paradigms aforementioned on "time" dimension, and try to explore the new thought and directions of ambidextrous behavior research.
作者 岑杰
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期3-14,共12页 Foreign Economics & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71402166) 中国博士后科学基金项目(2016M592011) 浙江省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地(浙江工商大学工商管理学科)项目(JYTgs20151204)
关键词 二元行为研究 范式之争 时间视角 ambidextrous behavior research paradigm dispute temporal perspective
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献78

  • 1吴晓波.二次创新的周期与企业组织学习模式[J].管理世界,1995,11(3):168-172. 被引量:65
  • 2吴晓波.二次创新的进化过程[J].科研管理,1995,16(2):27-35. 被引量:142
  • 3汪建成,毛蕴诗.技术改进、消化吸收与自主创新机制[J].经济管理,2007,33(3):22-27. 被引量:24
  • 4Li, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W. & Schoenmakers, W., 2008, "Exploration and Exploitation in Innovation: Reframing the Interpretation", Creativity and Innovation Management, 17 (2) , pp. 107-126.
  • 5March, J. G., 1991, "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning", Organization Science, 2( 1 ), pp. 71-87.
  • 6Marsden, P. V., 1990, "Network Data and Measurement", Annual Review of Sociology, 16( 1 ), pp. 435-463.
  • 7McEvily, B. & Zaheer, A., 1999, "Bridging Ties: a Source of Firm Heterogeneity in Competitive Capabilities", Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), pp. 1133-1156.
  • 8O'Reilly III, C. A. & Tushman, M. L., 2004, "The Ambidextrous Organization", Harvard Business Review, 82 (4) , pp. 74-83.
  • 9Patton, M. Q., 1987, How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • 10Pettigrew, A. M., 1990, "Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice", Organization Science, 1 (3), pp. 267-292.

共引文献154

同被引文献59

引证文献8

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部