期刊文献+

刑法调整违反经济规制行为的边界 被引量:14

How to Use Criminal Punishment on the Act of Violating Economic Regulation
原文传递
导出
摘要 在我国,由公权力实施的惩罚类型主要是行政处罚和刑事处罚,相应地,针对违反国家对经济活动规制行为的惩罚,也存在"惩罚二元制"。在法律实践中,如何区分经济性违法行为与经济犯罪是一个相当复杂的问题。结合规制理论,可以将"破坏社会主义市场经济秩序罪"区分为单纯规制犯和非单纯规制犯。两者都违反了国家对经济活动的规制;不同的是,非单纯规制犯还侵犯了个体性法益。在我国现有法治框架下,对于单纯规制犯的刑法立法应当持十分审慎的态度,对这类行为原则上以行政处罚为宜;对属于单纯规制犯的犯罪类型,在司法适用中,应通过目的解释方法限缩其实际适用范围。 In China, there are two main punishments by the state: administrative penalty and criminal penalty. Accordingly, punishments on individual's violating economic regulation constitute a penalty system of duality. In current practice, it is indeed a rather tough legal issue how to distinguish econom- ic crimes from economic administrative violation. Referring to the theory of regulation, economic crimes can be divided into two categories: purely regulatory crimes and mixed regulatory crimes. Both of them violate the legal orders formed by the regulation of the state on economic acts, and the latter also violates individual rights. Under the current framework of legal system, upmost vigilanceandpru- dence is required to provide a new article in criminal code on violating the economic regulation, as such behaviors can be punished by administrative penalty. For those provisions already in criminal code, they should be applied with cautiousness by using teleological method of interpretation.
作者 时延安
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期110-119,共10页 Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词 单纯规制犯 经济犯罪 非法经营类犯罪 目的解释 purely regulatory crimes economic crimes unlawful business operation teleologicalmethod of interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献117

  • 1Baumann,关键词 Wirtschaftsstrafrecht, in: Staatslexikon, hrsg. von der Gorres-Gesellschaft, 6. Aufl. , Bd. 8, 1963, Spalte 822.
  • 27. Aufl. des Staatslexikons, Bd. 5, 1989, Sp. 822 ff.
  • 3Tiedemann, Wirtschaftsstrafrecht. Einftihrung und Allgemeiner Teil, 2004, Rdn. 45.
  • 4Tiedemann, Wirtschaftsbetrug, 1999 (Sonderausgabe aus Leipziger Kommentar zum StGB, 11. Aufl. ),§ 264 Rdn. 14 und § 264a Rdn. 13, 14.
  • 5Otto, ZStW 96 (1984), 354.
  • 6Revue Internationale de Droit Penal 54 (1983), 33, und 56 (1985), 493.
  • 7Otto, ZStW 97 (1985), 714.
  • 8Empfehlung Nr. R (81) 12, Anhang Nr. 10, des Ministerkomitees des Europarats. European Committee on Crime Problems, Economic Crime, 1981, S. 7 ff. , 11.
  • 9FSf. H.-D. Schwind (脚注3), S. 177, 189.
  • 10Tiedemann, Wirtschaftsstrafrecht AT, Rdn. 45.Rdn. 43 ff.

共引文献94

同被引文献181

引证文献14

二级引证文献264

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部