期刊文献+

应用位置信息损失的Listwise排序学习方法的研究 被引量:3

Research on Listwise Approaches of Learning to Rank Based on Position Discount
下载PDF
导出
摘要 排序学习是机器学习与信息检索相互结合的研究领域,它利用机器学习的方法自动调节参数、综合多种排序特征、同时可以避免过拟合,进而得到新的排序模型用于排序被检索的文档.在排序学习方法中,Listwise方法的排序效果相对较好,但是目前已有的属于此类学习算法也有很多缺点:由于是基于列表所有的置换进行训练,时间复杂度太高;其损失函数并未充分利用极其重要的排序位置信息.本文基于此提出了新的学习算法,引入了位置信息损失因子,构建了新的损失函数,同时使用了效率更高的训练方法.最后在LETOR 4.0数据集上的实验结果表明,新学习算法的排序性能得到了较为明显的提升. Learning-to-rank has become a popular research area at the intersection of machine learning,and information retrieval. It u- ses methods of machine learning to automatically tune parameters, combine features for ranking, avoid over-fitting. The performance of the listwise ranking algorithms are. in general better than other ranking algorithms. But the listwise approach also has certain aspects to improve. For example,the training complexities of some listwise algorithms are high since the evaluation of their loss function are per- mutation based. Moreover the position information has not been fully utilized. In this paper, we are not only to choose a more efficient learning algorithm, but also improve loss function by introducing position discount factors. The experimental results onpublicly availa- ble LETOR data show that the new algorithm is competitivewith state-of-the-art algorithms.
出处 《小型微型计算机系统》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期20-23,共4页 Journal of Chinese Computer Systems
关键词 信息检索 排序学习 Listwise 损失函数 Information retrieval learning to, rank Listwise loss function
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献61

  • 1Liu T Y. Learning to rank Foundations and Trends in (3) :225-331. for information retrieval [ J ]. Information Retrieval, 2009,3.
  • 2Nallapati R. Discriminative models for information retrie- val [ C l// SIGIR Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Sheffield, UK, 2004 : 64-71.
  • 3Xu J, Li H. AdaRank : A boosting algorithm for information retrieval [ C ]// Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Amsterdam, TheNetherlands, 2007 : 391-398.
  • 4Yue Y, Finley T, Radlinski F, et al. A support vector met- hod for optimizing average precision [ C l// Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Amsterdam ,The Netherlands ,2007:271-278.
  • 5Cao Z, Qin T, Liu T ~, et al. Learning to rank: From pairwise approach to listwise approach [ C ]// Procee- dings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, Corvallis, Oregon, USA,2007 : 129-136.
  • 6Xia F, Liu T Y, Wang J. Listwise approach to learning to rank-theory and algorithm [ C ]// Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, Helsinki, Finland, 2008 : 192-199.
  • 7Liu T Y, Qin T, Xu J, et al. LETOR: Benchmark dataset for research on learning to rank for information retrieval [ C]/! SIGIR2007 Workshop on Learning to Rank for |R , Amsterdam , The Netherlands ,2007:3-10.
  • 8Qin T, Zhang X D, Tsai M F, et al. Query-level loss functions for information retrieval [ J ]. Information Processing and Management,2008,44 ( 2 ) :838-855.
  • 9Luce R D. Individual Choice Behavior [ M ]. New York : Wiley, 1959.
  • 10Tsai M F, Liu T Y, Qin T, et al. FRank: A Ranking Method with Fidelity Loss[ C]//Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on R~ ~'arch and Development in Information Retrieval, Amsterdam ,The Netherlands ,2007:383-390.

共引文献17

同被引文献37

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部