期刊文献+

专家科学知识与城市绿色规划——基于知识观的角度

Experts' Scientific Knowledge and Urban Green Planning:From the Perspective of Knowledge
下载PDF
导出
摘要 城市环境决策依赖科学又不是完全按照生态专家的意愿,这引发对环境专家科学知识的科学性与作用的争议,聚焦于科学与决策的鸿沟及能否融合它。是世界观、价值观还是利益、知识区域扩展了科学与政策的鸿沟?知识观视角下,本质的联系在于:专家知识的科学性与决策是两个界面;专家知识也具有不确定性;科学与决策都是有限理性;科学的不确定性与环境政策是一个非线性的复杂过程。实践上,科学对绿色规划的影响力在于政府官员怎样对待专家知识以及社会对官员权力的看法。荷兰城市决策者普遍认为专家知识具有实用性,但对推动"知识合作生产""知识经纪"并不热心和认同,应对科学的不确定性更应"等等看"。对其背后假设的哲学思考,可以推动我国对待环境专家科学知识的理性行为。 Urban environmental decision--making depends on science and is not entirely in accordance with the wishes of ecological experts, which led to the controversy of scientificity and the role of expert knowledge, focusing on the scientific and decision--making gap and whether it can be integrated. Is the world outlook, values, interests or knowl- edge expand the gap of science and policy? From the view of knowledge, the essence relationship are those that scienti- ficity and decision--making is two interfaces; expert knowledge is uncertain; science and decision--making is limited rational; the uncertainty of science and environmental policy is a complex process of nonlinear. In practice, the influ- ence of science on green planning lies in how government officials treat expert knowledge and the views of society on official power. Holland City decision--makers generally believe that the expert knowledge is practical, but not agree to promote the "knowledge cooperation production"" knowledge broker ". Scientific uncertainty should be put on "wait and see". The philosophy behind those assumption can promote the rational behavior of our country to the scientific knowledge of environmental experts.
作者 蒋显荣
出处 《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第1期25-30,共6页 Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
基金 2016年湖南省高校创新平台开放基金项目(16K006) 2016湖南社科基金思政课题(16B06)
关键词 科学-政策相互影响 城市绿色规划 环境评价 science-- policy interface urban green planning environmental assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1张安民.洪谦与维也纳学派及其对形而上学的拒斥[J].宁夏党校学报,2005,7(2):65-68. 被引量:1
  • 2黄见德.20世纪西方哲学东渐史导论[M].北京:首都师范大学出版社,2007.
  • 3严复.与外交报主人论教育,中国哲学史资料选集(下)[M].北京:中华书局,1983:412.
  • 4梁启超.“国民十大元气论”叙论[A].//梁启超哲学论文选[C].北京:北京大学出版社,1984:37.
  • 5Ison R, Blaekmore C, Ia quintoBL. To- wards Systemic and Adaptive Governance:Exploring the Revealing and Concealing Aspects of Contemporary Social Learning Meta Phors [J]. Ecological Economics, 2013,87 ( 6 ) : 34-42 ; 32 ; 35-37 ; 36 ; 36 ; 38-39.
  • 6Lakoff, G. Why It Matters How We Frame the Environ- ment. Environmental Communication [J]. Journal of Nature and Cul- ture,2010,4 ( 1 ) :70-81 ;72 ;73 ;76.
  • 7Steen G. The Language of Knowledge Management:a Linguistic Approach to Metaphor Analysis[J]. Systems Research and Behavior- al Science ,2011,28 ( 2 ) : 181-188 ; 182-196.
  • 8Black, M. More about Metaphor In : Ortony, A. ( Ed. ), Metaphor mid Thought [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2011 : 19- 43 ;41-43 ;35-43.
  • 9Hajer, M. A. A frame in the Fields:Policy Making and the Reinven- tion of Politics[M]. Cambridge University Press,2013:88-112.
  • 10Barry,J. Seeking Sustainability Discourses with Q Methodology[J]. Ecological Economics ,2010,28(3 ) :337-345.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部