期刊文献+

保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术治疗早期前列腺癌(附手术视频) 被引量:22

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for early-stage prostate cancer(with video)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术的初步应用。方法:2016年9~10月,入组早期前列腺癌10例,实施保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术。结果:10例手术均获成功,手术切缘均为阴性。完成手术时间170~250(196±25)min,术中出血量150~500(260±128)ml,术后住院日6~7 d,术后拔除导尿管时间14 d,仅1例患者存在尿失禁(每天1块尿垫),术后1个月完全恢复。结论:保留Retzius间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术安全、有效、可靠,有利于早期恢复控尿。 Objective : To investigate the application of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) in the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer. Methods : We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 10 cases of early-stage prostate cancer treated by RS-RARP with the Da Vinci Robot Surgical System from September to October 2016. Results: All the operations were successfully completed without positive surgical margins. The operation time was 170 -250 min ( [ 196 ± 25 ] rain), the intraop- erative blood ].oss was 150 - 500 ml ( [260 ± 128 ] ml), the postoperative hospital stay was 6 -7 days, and the catheterization time was 14 days. Urinary continence occurred after catheter removal in 1 patient and was recovered 1 month later. Conclusion : RS-RARP is a safe, effective and reliable method for the treatment of prostate cancer and conducive to the early recovery of urinary continence.
出处 《中华男科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期34-38,共5页 National Journal of Andrology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81572519) 南京市科技发展计划项目(2016512030)~~
关键词 机器人 腹腔镜 前列腺癌 根治性前列腺切除术 Retzius间隙 robot surgical system laparoscopy prostate cancer radical prostatectomy Retzius-sparing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1Falk V, Diegeler A, Wahher T, et al. Total endoscopic computer enhanced coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2000, 17: 38-45.
  • 2Chen GF, Zhou D, Zhang Q. Clinical applications of da Vinci robot surgical system. J Robot Technology and Application, 2011, (4): 1-13.
  • 3Box GN, Ahlering TE. Robotic radical prostatectomy: Long-term out eomes. J Curt Opin Urol, 2008, 18 (2) : 173-179.
  • 4Singh I. Robotics in urological surgery: Review of current status and maneuverability, and comparison of robot-assisted and tradi- tional laparoscopy. J Comput Aided Surg, 2011, 16( 1 ) : 38-45.
  • 5Zhou NX, Chen JZ, Liu Q, et al. Outcomes of pancreatoduode- nectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Ro- bot, 2011, 7(2): 131-137.
  • 6Najarian S, Fallahnezhad M, Afshari E. Advances in medical ro- botic systems with specific applications in surgery -- a review. J Med Eng Tecbnol, 2011, 35( 1 ) : 19-33.
  • 7Malcolm JB, Fabriz io MD, Barone BB, et al. Quality of life af- ter open or robotic pmstatectomy, cryoablation or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. Urology, 2010, 183 (5): 1822- 1828.
  • 8Farnham SB, Webster TM, Hen'ell SD, et al. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology,2006, 67(2) : 360-363.
  • 9Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical pros- tatectomy: Assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer, 2007, 110 (9) : 195t-1958.
  • 10Berryhill R Jr, Jhaveri J, Yadav R, et al. Robotic prostatecto- my: A review of outcomes compared with lapareseopic and open approaches. Urology, 2008, 72( l): 15-23.

共引文献42

同被引文献170

引证文献22

二级引证文献113

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部