期刊文献+

老年人衰弱评估量表的编制及信效度检验 被引量:76

Development and reliability and validity tests of Elderly Frailty Assessment Scale
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的编制老年人衰弱评估量表并进行信效度检验,为评估老年人衰弱水平提供一个有效的测评工具。方法根据文献研究、现有衰弱评估量表及小组会议的结果,初步拟定量表条目池,通过专家咨询形成量表初稿。采用量表初稿对天津市不同社区420名老年人进行问卷调查,运用SPSS 20.0对数据进行统计分析,测定量表的信效度。结果老年人衰弱评估量表包括35个条目,探索性因子分析提取4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为72.685%。量表内容效度指数为0.932,各条目内容效度指数为0.824~1。总量表Cronbach’sα系数为0.952,重测信度为0.937。结论所编制的老年人衰弱评估量表具有良好的信效度,可用于我国老年人衰弱水平的评估。 Objective To develop the Elderly Frailty Assessment Scale and test its reliability and validity. Methods The primary item pool was formulated through literature review,compounding existing instruments mea- suring elderly frailty and group meeting. The items were selected by expert consultation. Totally 420 elderly adults were selected to test the reliability and validity and SPSS 20.0 was used to analyze data. Results The Elderly Frailty Assessment Scale consisted of 35 items;the exploratory factor analysis identified four principal factors which explained 72.685% of the total variance. The item content validity index ranged from 0.824 to 1,and the scale content validity index was 0.932. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.952 and test-retest reliability was 0.937. Conclusion The Elderly Frailty Assessment Scale is reliable and valid,which can be used to evaluate elderly frailty.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期49-53,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
基金 国家社会科学基金(14BSH124)
关键词 老年人 衰弱 信度 效度 Elderly Marasmus Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献19

  • 1虞一萍,赵介城,崔萍.成人智残评定量表与简式韦氏成人智力量表的一致性研究[J].上海精神医学,1996,8(3):153-154. 被引量:5
  • 2唐丹.康复护理.广州:广东科技出版社,2009:37.
  • 3中华人民共和国国家统计局.2010年第六次全国人口普查主要数据公报.http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/t20110428_402722232.htm.
  • 4龚耀先 戴晓阳.韦氏智力量表的简式用法[J].湖南医学院学报,1984,9(4):393-393.
  • 5Kim SH, Kim HJ, Lee SI, et al. Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patientsin Korea[J]. Qual Life Res, 2012, 21(6): 1065-1073.
  • 6Kim SH, Hwang JS, Kim TW, et al. Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D for cancer patients in Korea[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2012, 20(12): 3155-3160.
  • 7Pickard AS, De Leon MC, Kohlmann T, et al. Psychometric comparison of the standard EQ-5D to a 5 level version in cancer patients[J]. Med Care, 2007, 45(3): 259-263.
  • 8北京市人民政府.《北京市养老服务机构管理办法》.[2001-01-01].http://www.chinaacc.com/new/63/74/117/2006/6/wa09295113512266002615-0.htm.
  • 9Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, et al. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. International Disability Study, 1988,10(2):61-63.
  • 10Quinn TJ,Langhorne P, Scott DJ.Barthel Index for stroke trials:development, properties,and application. Stroke, 2011,42(4):1146-1151.

共引文献135

同被引文献627

引证文献76

二级引证文献1038

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部