《四库全书总目》与《四库采进书目》对证研究——以子部艺术类书法文献为例

The Comparative Study of Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu and Si Ku Adopted Bibliography——Taking the Calligraphy Literatures of the Sub-Arts as the Example

《四库全书总目》中标注了著录、存目文献的采进来源,但是,将每书来源与《四库采进书目》对证,两者之间并不能一一对应;主要有两种情况:一是《四库全书总目》标明来源而未见于《四库采进书目》,其原因主要有由丛书中析出、由文集中析出、《四库全书总目》标注错误、《四库采进书目》漏记等;二是见于《四库采进书目》而未见于《四库全书总目》,其原因主要在于禁毁、撤出、内容与其他文献重复等。

Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu noted the adopted sources of description and collection literatures. However, compared with Si Ku Adopted Bibliography, the source of each book can＇t be one to one correspondence. One, Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu noted the sources but not been seen in Si Ku Adopted Bibliography because of the precipitation from series and collections, the annotation errors of Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu, and the missing note of Si Ku Adopted Bibliography the other, Si Ku Adopted Bibliography noted the sources but not been seen in Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu , be- cause of the destruction, retreat and the repeat with other contents.