期刊文献+

亚洲基础设施投资银行主权贷款规则研究

Research on Sovereignty Financing Regulations of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前亚投行已建立了较审慎的主权贷款制度,包含完整的项目管理制度、明确的贷前尽职调查义务、强调贷款项目的环境和社会影响评估以及信息披露义务。但是,以上规则尚不能完全实现对于主权贷款风险的控制,在主权国家风险评级体系、主权借贷行为的合法性、债务可持续性分析、透明度上都有欠缺。世界银行、国际货币基金组织、联合国贸发会议等可资借鉴的丰富立法资源和实践经验,都为亚投行主权贷款规则的完善奠定了良好基础。在现有的亚投行主权贷款风险控制制度的基础上,亚投行未来应构建主权贷款风险评估体系,注重借款国借款行为的合法性,加强债务可持续性评价机制建设以及提高放贷行为的透明度。 By now, Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank has established a relatively prudent sovereignty loan system, which involve the complete project management system, explicit pre - loan investigation obligation, emphasizing the environment and social impact assessment of the loan project, and information disclosure obligations.. However, the above regulations cannot control the sovereignty loan risks very well. It lacks integrated sovereignty risk analysis system, legitimacy of sovereignty loan be- havior, debt sustainability analysis, and transparency. The legislation and practical experiences of World Bank, International Monetary Fund and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development have built a strong foundation for the improvement of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank's relevant rules. Based on the existing sovereignty loan provisions, Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank could build more integrated sovereignty loan risk evaluation system and emphasize legitimacy of sovereignty loan behavior, strengthen the construction of debt sustainability evaluation mechanism, and improve the transparency of lending behavior.
作者 陈喆 张晓君
出处 《学术探索》 北大核心 2017年第1期85-90,共6页 Academic Exploration
基金 中国法学会2015年度部级法学研究重点委托课题(CLS(2015)ZDWT14)
关键词 亚洲基础设施投资银行 主权贷款 主权违约风险 风险控制 Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank sovereignty loan sovereign default risk risk control
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献35

  • 1George W. Baker, Woodrow Wilson~s Use of the Non-Recognition Policy in Costa Rica, 22 AMERICAS 7 (1965).
  • 2Patrick Bolton & David Skeel, Odious Debts or Odious Regimes?, 70 LAW &CONTEMP. PROBS. 83 (Autumn 2007).
  • 3ALBERT H. CHOI and ERIC A. POSNER, A CRITIQUE OF THE ODIOUS DEBT, DOCTRINE, LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS, Vol. 70:33,p.
  • 4Odette Lienau, Who is the "Sovereign" in Sovereign Debt? Reinterpreting a Rule-of-Law Frame- work from the Early Twentieth Century, 33 Yale J. Int'l L. 63 (2008),p.102.
  • 5Lee C. Buchheit et al., The Dilemma of Odious Debts, 56 Duke L.J. 1201, p.1226 (2007); Christiana O- choa, From Odious Debt to Odious Finance: Avoiding the Externalities of a Functional Odious Debt Doctrine, 49 Harv. Int'l L.J. 109, pp.156-157 (2008).
  • 6Michael Kremer, Seema Jayachandran and Jonathan Shafter: Applying the Odious Debts Doctrine while Preserving Legitimate Lending.
  • 7Moody's, Citing U.S. Concern, Cancels Ratings on Iran Debt, New York Times, 4 June 2002: 7, sect. W.
  • 8The Serbian Loans Case (France v Serbia), Judgment, 12 July 1929, PCIJ, Ser. A (1929), A20; Brazilian Loans Case (France v Brazil), Judgment, 12 July 1929, PCIJ, Set. A (1929), A21 before the Perma- nent Court of International Justice.
  • 9林河.债务危机与货币危机相关性研究[D].复旦大学,2001.
  • 10Alesina,A., Tabellini, G. A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1990, 57 (6): 403-414.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部