期刊文献+

清代宝应刘氏家学历久传承原因述论——从家风、家教及姻娅说起 被引量:2

Studies on the Reasons for the Longtime Passing-on of the Lius' Clanlore of Baoying in the Qing Dynasty——from the Perspective of Clan Tradition,Tutoring and Marriage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宝应刘氏培育出多位学者,家门著述颇丰,终清一代学术传衍不辍,这与刘氏谨严的家风、良好的家教、稳定的姻娅圈密不可分。刘氏尊奉祖训、谨身节用的家风,有助于族人中形成励志向学、敦品立行的氛围;家塾的授业与长辈的指导,有利于子孙文化的普及与学问的精深;稳定的姻娅交往圈,将文化家族中的女性带入刘家,便于羽翼家族教育,辅助家学传承。此外不断适应学风的治学特点,使刘氏家学得以保持旺盛的学术生命力。对宝应刘氏家学传承问题的归因,进一步丰富了家族史与学术史研究,特别是对清代学术转型课题有着重要的借鉴意义。 There cultivated many scholars and there published many works in Liu Clan in Baoying,which didnt stop until the end of Qing dynasty. This is closely related to the strict clan tradition, good home nurture, and stable marriage circle. The clansmen of Liu enshrined the ancestral doctrine of prudence and thrift, which is helpful to form the atmosphere of studying hard and behaving well. The instruction of clannish school and the guidance of the elder clansmen benefited the descendants in knowledge acquiring and culture nurturing;their stable marital circle ensured that the clansmen married the good -nurtured girls, who brought their dominant culture to the clan of Liu. This enriched and extended the clanlore. What' s more, the incorpo- rating and adaptive style of study made the clanlore of Liu revolve unceasingly and stay progressive in the academia. To summa- rize the reasons for the longtime passing - on of Lius' clanlore is to enrich the studies of history of clans and academics. Espe- cially,it is of great significance for the historiography transformation of Qing dynasty.
作者 李晓明 LI Xiao - ming(Compile and Research Center of RuZang, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
出处 《安徽史学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期104-111,共8页 Historical Research In Anhui
基金 教育部古籍整理研究专项基金重大项目"<皇清经解>点校整理"(0934) 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"清代经解文献整理与研究"(CCNU09X00002)的阶段性成果
关键词 宝应刘氏家学 传承原因 家风 家教 姻娅 顺应学风 clanlore of Lius in Baoying reasons for long - time passing - on clannish style clan nurture marriage com-munication adaptive attitude of learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献76

  • 1王俊义.论乾嘉扬州学派的特色[J].中国人民大学学报,1990,4(1):77-81. 被引量:2
  • 2王俊义.论乾嘉“扬州学派”[J].青海社会科学,1989(3):81-88. 被引量:5
  • 3[1]顾廷龙.清代朱卷集成[M].台北:成文出版有限公司,1992:149.
  • 4[2]嵇文甫.左派王学[M].台北:国文天地杂志社,1990:87.
  • 5章太炎.《清儒》,章太炎著、徐复注.《馗书详注》,上海古籍出版社,2000年,第132-175页.
  • 6陈祖武.《关于乾嘉学派的几点思考》,收于其著《清儒学术拾零》,湖南人民出版社,2002年,第159-173页.
  • 7汪中.《大清故候选知县李君之铭》,《新编汪中集》,广陵书社,2005年,第480页.
  • 8刘盼遂编.《高邮王氏父子年谱》.沈云龙主编.《近代中国史料丛刊》第80辑,乾隆三十一年条.
  • 9汪喜孙编.《容甫先生年谱》.收于《新编汪中集》附录,乾隆三十七年条.
  • 10章学诚.《邵兴桐别传》,《章氏遗书》,卷十八.

共引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部