期刊文献+

幽门螺杆菌感染的二线根除方案比较

COMPARISON OF SECOND-LINE THERAPY FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较8日含铋剂序贯方案、10日含铋剂序贯方案、10日序贯方案、10日铋剂四联方案,补救(二线)根除幽门螺杆菌(HP)的疗效及不良反应。方法 340例初次(一线)根除失败的HP感染患者分为四组。A组:前4日,雷贝拉唑10mg、阿莫西林1 000mg、果胶铋300mg;后4日,雷贝拉唑10mg、克拉霉素500mg、奥硝唑500mg、果胶铋300mg。B组:前5日,雷贝拉唑10mg、阿莫西林1 000mg、果胶铋300mg;后5日,雷贝拉唑10mg、克拉霉素500mg、奥硝唑500mg、果胶铋300mg。C组:前5日,雷贝拉唑10mg、阿莫西林1 000mg;后5日,雷贝拉唑10mg、克拉霉素500mg、奥硝唑500mg。D组:雷贝拉唑10mg、果胶铋300mg、阿莫西林1 000mg、呋喃唑酮100mg,疗程10d。各种药物每日服用2次。比较各组HP根除率和不良反应。结果采用按意向性治疗(ITT)分析和按符合方案(PP)分析,对HP根除率进行比较。A、B、C、D四组的根除率ITT分析分别为:89.4%、90.6%、76.5%、77.6%,PP分析分别为:92.7%、93.9%、78.3%、81.5%。2种分析方法均显示A组和B组的HP根除率明显高于C组和D组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而A组和B组之间根除率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。四组的不良反应发生率分别为:6.1%、7.3%、6.0%、18.5%,A组、B组、C组低于D组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论8日含铋剂序贯方案可作为一线根除HP失败后安全有效的短疗程二线根除方案。 Objective To compare the efficacy and side effect of 8-day bismuth-containing sequential therapy,10-day bismuth-containing sequential therapy,10-day sequential therapy and 10-day quadruple therapy as second-line regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.Methods Three hundred and forty patients of initial treatment failure were divided into four groups randomly:group A,rabeprazole 10 mg,amoxicillin1 000 mg and colloidal bismuth pectin300 mg,at the first four days,followed rabeprazole 10 mg,clarithromycin500mg,ornidazole 500 mg and colloidal bismuth pectin300 mg,at the last four days;group B,rabeprazole 10 mg,amoxicillin 1 000 mg and colloidal bismuth pectin 300 mg,at the first five days,followed rabeprazole 10 mg,clarithromycin 500 mg,ornidazole 500 mg and colloidal bismuth pectin 300 mg,at the last five days;group C,rabeprazole 10 mg and amoxicillin 1 000 mg,at the first four days,followed rabeprazole 10 mg,clarithromycin500mg and ornidazole 500 mg at the last four days;group D,rabeprazole 10 mg,colloidal bismuth pectin 300 mg,amoxicillin 100 mg and furazolidone 1 000 mg,ten days.All drugs were given twice daily.Comparison of Helicobacter pylori eradication rate and adverse reaction were observed.Results The intention-to-treat(ITT)analysis and per protocol(PP)analysis were used to compare the eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori.ITT eradication rate and PP eradication rate of group A,group B,group C,group D were 89.4%,90.6%,76.5%,77.6% and 92.7%,93.9%,78.3%,81.5%,respectively.Two analysis methods showed that Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of group A and group B was significantly higher than group C and group D(P〈0.05).No significantly difference was found between group A and group B(P〈0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in group A,group B and group C were lower than group D(P〈0.05).Conclusion 8-day bismuth-containing sequential therapy is safe and effective second-line therapy after a failed first-line therapy.
出处 《中国煤炭工业医学杂志》 2017年第1期23-26,共4页 Chinese Journal of Coal Industry Medicine
基金 唐山市科技支撑计划项目(编号:14130229a)
关键词 幽门螺杆菌 序贯方案 四联方案 二线根除 根除率 Helicobacter pylori Sequential therapy Quadruple therapy Second line regimens Eradication rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献64

共引文献1544

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部