摘要
目的观察头针配合体针治疗荨麻疹的临床疗效。方法将80例荨麻疹患者随机分为治疗组42例和对照组38例。治疗组采用头针配合体针治疗,对照组采用传统体针治疗。两组均隔日治疗1次,10次为1个疗程。治疗2个疗程后,观察两组治疗前后症状、体征总积分及血清总Ig E水平变化情况,并比较两组临床疗效。结果治疗组总有效率和治愈率分别为92.9%和61.9%,对照组分别为76.3%和36.8%,两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后症状、体征总积分均较同组治疗前显著降低(P<0.05),且治疗组治疗后症状、体征总积分与对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗后血清总Ig E水平较同组治疗前显著降低(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗后血清总Ig E水平与对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论头针配合体针是一种治疗荨麻疹的有效方法 。
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of scalp plus body acupuncture in treating urticaria. Method Eighty urticaria patients were randomized into a treatment group of 42 cases and a control group of 38 cases. The treatment group was intervened by scalp plus body acupuncture, while the control group was treated with conventional body acupuncture. The two groups were treated once every other day, 10 sessions as a treatment course. The symptoms and signs scores and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) level were observed before the treatment and after 2 treatment courses, and the clinical efficacies were also compared between the two groups. Result The total effective rate and recovery rate were respectively 92.9% and 61.9% in the treatment group, versus 76.3% and 36.8% in the control group, and the between-group differences were statistically significant (P〈0.05). After the treatment, the symptoms and signs scores significantly declined in both groups (P〈0.05), and the symptoms and signs scores in the treatment group were markedly different from those in the control group (P〈0.05). The serum IgE level in the treatment group after the intervention was significantly lower than that before the intervention (P〈0.05). After the treatment, the serum IgE level in the treatment group was significantly different from that in the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Scalp plus body acupuncture is an effective method in treating urticaria.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2017年第1期77-80,共4页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
关键词
针刺疗法
头针
荨麻疹
IGE
Acupuncture therapy
Scalp acupuncture
Urticaria
Immunoglobulin E