摘要
法律基本原则或法律制度的本质要求在许多情况下都是解释法律或法律行为的基点。法释〔2016〕5号第7条赋予调解书直接引发物权变动,颠倒了实体法和程序法关于实体为里、程序为表的根本原则,应予修正。解释合同法第402条关于"合同直接约束委托人和第三人"的规定,应当甚至必须依据代理制度的本质要求,于是,该合同项下的权利义务不由外贸代理人承受就是理所当然的。确定合同法关于解除权及其行使的规定的性质和效力,不如放弃强制性规定、任意性规定的思考、衡量的路径,改采依据合同解除制度的目的及功能、诚实信用原则、交易习惯,考量个案案情,综合多项因素进行判断,然后得出结论,这将更为现实,更为允当。
Basic legal principle or the nature of legal system is the basic point in the explanation of law or legal action. In Article 7, Number 5 of Legal Explanation(2016), endowment conciliation letter directly leads to a change of property right, inverting the basic principle that entity law and procedure law concerning entity is the base, and procedure is the manifestation. It should be amended. In Article 402 of Contract Law, the regulation that"contract directly constrains trustees and the third party" should and must be based on the basic requirement of deputy system and therefore,right and duty involved in the contract should not be trusted by the foreign trade deputy. It is more proper to remove the contract according to the aim and function of removing contract system, honesty principle, trading habit, individual case, comprehensive consideration of many factors instead of compulsory removing, random consideration of regulation and path.
作者
崔建远
CUI Jian-yuan(Law School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 100084, China)
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期77-83,共7页
Seeking Truth
关键词
基本原则
制度本质
调解书
法律关系
解除权行使
basic principle
nature of system
conciliation letter
legal relation
right of removing