期刊文献+

全结肠系膜切除术在腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术中的应用效果 被引量:5

Complete mesocolic excision applied in laparoscope-assistantly radical surgery for right colon cancer:Efficacy observation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究全结肠系膜切除术(CME)在腹腔镜(LS)辅助右半结肠癌(RCC)根治术中的应用效果。方法将笔者所在医院收治的78例原发性RCC患者随机分为两组,各39例。对照组给予传统根治手术治疗,研究组给予CME根治性手术治疗,比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果研究组与对照组手术时间相比,无明显差异(P>0.05),但研究组术中出血量明显少于对照组、肛门排气时间、住院天数明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组淋巴结清扫数量明显少于研究组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组与对照组并发症发生率分别为10.3%、28.2%,两组对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 CME在LS辅助RCC根治术中具有较高的可行性,临床应用安全、可靠,有利于增加淋巴结的清扫数量,促进患者术后康复,应用价值显著,值得推广。 Objective To explore the effect of complete mesocolic excision(CME) applied in laparoscope- assisted radical resection of right colon cancer (RCC). Methods The 78 cases of primary RCC in author's hospital were randomly divided into two groups,39 cases for each group. The control group was treated with conventional radical surgery,the study group was treated with CME used in radical excision;then the effect was compared between the two groups. Results In the operation time there was no significant difference (P〉0.05) between both groups,but in the study group blood loss was significantly less than in the control group,anal exhaust time,hospitalization time were significantly shorter than in the control group,the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05);in the control group,the number of lymph nodes was significantly less than in the study group,the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05);in the study group and the control group complication incidence was 10.3% and 28.2%,respectively,there were statistically significant differences between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion CME applied in laparoscope-assisted RCC radical surgery has a high feasibility,and is safe and reliable;it is conducive to increase the number of lymph node dissection,can promote postoperative recovery of patients,the value is significant,thus worth promoting.
作者 雷大钊
出处 《实用医药杂志》 2017年第1期17-19,共3页 Practical Journal of Medicine & Pharmacy
关键词 全结肠系膜切除术 右半结肠癌根治术 腹腔镜 Complete mesocolic resection(CMR) Laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献76

  • 1牟一平,杨鹏,严加费,陈其龙,袁晓明,朱玲华,徐晓武.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床疗效评估[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(9):581-583. 被引量:83
  • 2钱晶,蒋春雷,钱友庆.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗结肠癌疗效比较[J].南方医科大学学报,2006,26(10):1533-1534. 被引量:25
  • 3林国乐,邱辉忠.腹腔镜在结直肠癌手术中的应用[J].肿瘤学杂志,2006,12(6):437-440. 被引量:12
  • 4Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008 : GLOBOCAN 2008 [ J ]. Int J Cancer, 2010, 127(12) :2893-2917.
  • 5Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation technical notes and outcome [ J ]. Colorectal Dis, 2009,11 (4) :354-365.
  • 6West NP, Morris E J, Rotimi O, et al. Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study [ J ]. Lancet Oncol,2008,9 (9) : 857 -865.
  • 7Ostenfeld EB, Eriehsen R, Iversen LH, et al. Survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer in central and northern Denmark, 1998-2009 [ J ]. Clin Epidemiol,2011,3 ( Suppl 1 ) : 27- 34.
  • 8Barbas AS, Turley RS, Mantyh CR, et al. Effect of surgeon specialization on long-term survival following colon cancer resection at an NCI-designated cancer center[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2012,106 (3) :219-223.
  • 9West NP, Hirotoshi K, Keiichi T, et al. Understanding optional colonic cancer surgery : comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesoeolic excision with central vascular ligation [ J ]. J Clin Oncol,2012,30 ( 15 ) : 1763-1769.
  • 10Law WL, Poon JT, Fan JK, et al. Survial following laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal cancer [ J ]. Int J Colorectal Dis,2012,27 (8) :1077-1085.

共引文献187

同被引文献59

引证文献5

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部