期刊文献+

腹腔镜阑尾切除术在急性阑尾炎治疗中的疗效分析 被引量:1

Analysis of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探析腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床效果。方法选取我院2015年1月-2016年7月收治的80例急性阑尾炎患者,均采取腹腔镜进行手术治疗,观察并记录本组手术时间、出血量、肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间及并发症发生情况等。结果 80例患者均成功完成手术,其平均手术时间为(60.3±14.7)min、平均术中出血量为(5.7±1.3)ml、肛门排气时间(24.0±2.1)h、下床活动时间(11.7±2.6)h及住院时间(4.3±1.0)d;80例患者,1例术后切口感染,发生率1.25%。结论 腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎优势明显,易探查,有诊疗双重作用,并发症少,创伤小,恢复快速,可作为首选方案。 Objective To study the clinical effect of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute appendicitis. Methods 80 cases of patients with acute appendicitis admitted in our hospital from January 2015 to July 2016 were treated with laparoscopic surgery. The operation time, blood loss, anal exhaust time, ambulation time, hospitalization time and occurrence of complications were recorded and recorded. Results The mean operative time was(60.3 ± 14.7) min, the mean blood loss during the operation was(5.7 ± 1.3) ml, the duration of anal exhaust was(24.0 ± 2.1) h, the time of ambulation was(11.7 ± 2.6) h and hospital stay(4.3 ± 1.0) days, respectively. In 80 patients, 1 patient developed incisional wound infection with an incidence of 1.25%. Conclusion Laparoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis has obvious advantages, easy exploration, diagnosis and treatment of dual role, fewer complications, trauma, rapid recovery, can be used as the preferred option.
作者 王文兵
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2016年第35期93-95,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 腹腔镜 阑尾切除术 急性阑尾炎 治疗效果 Laparoscopy Appendectomy Acute appendicitis Therapeutic effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献36

  • 1董荣坤,韩明福,张笃,车军.一孔法腹腔镜治疗阑尾炎[J].西部医学,2006,18(3):326-327. 被引量:9
  • 2程守服,刘树清,王文忠,姜光辉.急性阑尾炎腹腔镜与开腹手术疗效的对比研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2007,13(6):665-666. 被引量:22
  • 3陈道达,王国斌,卢晓明.重视急性阑尾炎病因和治疗的变化中国普通外科杂志,2009,12(7):93.
  • 4Jiang HX, Pan K, Xia LG, et al. Analysis and study of laparoscop- ic appendectomy for unusual appendicitis. China J Endosc,2005,11 (4) :350.
  • 5Ulrich G, Sheleika H, Harriett P, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy outcomes comparison based on a large administra rive data base. Ann surg,2004,239( 1 ) :43-52.
  • 6Marzouk M, Khater Mo Eisadek M, et al. Laperoseopie versus open Appendectomy. Surg Endosc ,2009,47 (5) :721-724.
  • 7LiX, ZhangJ, SangL, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional ap- pendectomy a meta-analysis of randomized eontroUed trims. BMC Gastroentero1,2010,10 : 129.
  • 8Serum K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy, 1983,15 (2) :59- 64.
  • 9Kong VY, Bulajic B, Allorto NL, et al. Acute Appendicitis in a Developing C ountryWorld J Surg Sep,2012,36 ( 9 ) :2068-2073.
  • 10Narita S, Tsuchiya N, Kumazawa T, et al. Comparison of surgical stress in patients undergoing open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by measuring perioperative serum cytokine levels[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2013, 23(1): 33 - 37.

共引文献34

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部