期刊文献+

酵母SUP4-o突变检测系统及铬遗传毒性分析

Genotoxicity investigation of tri- and hexavalent chromium using a yeast SUP4-o mutation assay
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:应用酵母SUP4-o突变检测系统来评价两种价态铬(Cr^(3+),Cr^(6+))的遗传毒性。方法:用电转化法将YCpMP2质粒转入MKP-o(SJPt576)得到SJR576-p菌株。用相同浓度(150μmol/L)三氯化铬和重铬酸钾(Cr^(3+),Cr^(6+))分别处理酵母SJR576-p细胞74 h,取适量培养细胞均匀涂布刀豆氨酸抗性筛选平板和尿嘧啶缺陷合成培养基(SC-Ura),计数克隆数。结果:150μmol/L三氯化铬和重铬酸钾处理导致SUP4-o正向突变频率分别为2.6×10^(-5)和2.3×10^(-5),比对照提高约5倍,两种价态铬之间无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:真核酵母SUP4-o突变检测系统对可疑遗传毒性化合物的分析具有多个可筛选的性状和遗传操作的简便性。三价铬也能够造成酵母细胞遗传物质的损伤,具有一定的遗传毒性。 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate genotoxicities of chromium (tri- and hexavalent states) using a new yeast mutation SUP4-o assay system. METHODS: YCpMP2 plasmid was transferred into MKP-o (SJR576) to obtain SJR576-p strain by electroporation. After treatment of the yeast cell SJR576-p with the same concentrations of Cr^3+ and Cr^6+ for 24 h,the cells were coated on canavanine resistance screening plates in uracil synthetic medium (SC-Ura),and the number of clones were subsequently counted. RESULTS: Compared with the untreated controls,the mutation rates of the treated groups with potassium dichromate and chromium trichloride increased five times. The values were about 23 and 26 parts per million,respectively. While there was no significant difference between the groups treated with Cr^3+ and Cr^6+. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that Cr^3+ can cause DNA damage and genotoxicity. Additionally,the yeast SUP4-o mutation assay system is useful for detecting genotoxicity.
作者 孟晓卿 房志家 魏红岩 杨占菊 黄志伟 MENG Xiaoqing FANG YANG Zhanju HUANG Zhijia WEI Hongyan Zhiwei(Key Laboratory of Science & Technology of Eco-Textile, College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China)
出处 《癌变.畸变.突变》 CAS CSCD 2017年第1期65-69,共5页 Carcinogenesis,Teratogenesis & Mutagenesis
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31100549) 生态纺织教育部重点实验室(东华大学/江南大学)资助课题
关键词 酵母 遗传损伤 突变 CR^3+ CR^6+ yeast genotoxicity mutations Cr^3+ Cr^6+
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Auerbach C,Robson JM.The chemical production of mutations.Science,1947,105 (2723):243-247
  • 2Macgregor JT,Casciano D,Müller L.Strategies and testing methods for identifying mutagenic risks.Mut Res,2000,455:3-20
  • 3Mortelmans K,Zeiger E.The Ames salmonells/microsome mutagenicity assay.Mut Res,2000,455:29-60
  • 4GaoPJ(高培基).Some questions on the Ames test[J].环境科学,1983,8(6):81-83.
  • 5周帮靖.常用中药的抗菌作用及其测定方法.重庆:科学技术文献出版社重庆分社,1986
  • 6Foster PL.Mechanisms of stationary phase mutation:a decade of adaptive mutation.Annu Rev Genet,1999,33:57-88
  • 7Takanashi H,Urano K.Statistical procedures for estimating the detection limit and determination limit of the Ames Salmonella mutagenicity assay.SciEnviron,1998,221:31-42
  • 8Cariello NF,Piegorsch WW.The Ames test:The two-fold rule revisited.Mut Res,1996,369:23-31
  • 9LiuCY(刘垂玗).Estimation of the microbial mutation rate[J].中国科学:B辑,1983,7:625-633.
  • 10Prival M,Simmon VF,Motelmans KE.Bacterial mutagenicity testing of 49 food ingredients gives very few positive results.Mut Res,1991,260:321-329

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部